锻压技术

汽车纵梁冲压成形数值模拟及试验验证

英文标题：Numerical simulation and experimental verification on stamping formability for automobile crossbeam

作者：毛卫国

分类号：TG386

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,42(4):55-58

摘要：

利用有限元模拟软件Autoform对汽车纵梁进行成形性分析，拟定落料弯曲切边、侧冲孔翻边、上翻边侧整形切边、冲孔、侧切边、侧冲孔的工艺路线，并对回弹趋势进行预测。分析表明：当压边力增大到1500 kN时，纵梁尾部回弹减少到1.75 mm，即通过增加压边力可提高零件塑性变形的程度从而减少回弹。经过实际验证，数值模拟结果对起皱等缺陷的位置和大小预测较为准确;数值模拟可对回弹进行定性预测，利用其结果进行修正后反复模拟，可将回弹量由首次预测的13 mm缩减到最终的2 mm，再通过测量实际零件的回弹量并结合数值模拟结果进行补偿和修正，可进一步提高零件尺寸精度。

The formability of automobile crossbeam was simulated by finite element modeling software Autoform. Then, the process route of blanking bending trimming, side piercing flanging, up-flangingside sizingcutting,piercing, side cutting, side piercing was designed, and the trend of springback was predicted. The results show that the springback at tail end of crossbeam reduces to 1.75 mm when the blank holder force increases to 1500 kN, that is to see that the plastic forming is improved and the springback is deduced by increasing blank holder force. The simulation result which verified by experiment indicates that the prediction of defect position of wrinkle as well as range is accurate. Then, the springback can be predicted qualitatively by numerical simulation, and the modified result is re-simulated over and over again. Therefore, the springback can be reduced from 13 mm to 2 mm. The springback obtained by practical part measurement is compensated and modified by combining with its numerical simulation result, and the part dimension accuracy can be improved.

基金项目：

国家重点研发计划（2016YFB0300405）

毛卫国（1971-），男，学士，工程师 E-mail：weiguo.mao@sgmw.com.cn

参考文献：

[1]李彩霞,杨艳.汽车前纵梁成形回弹控制[J]. 锻压技术, 2016, 41(11): 58-61.

Li C X, Yang Y. Spring-back control on front rail of auto-body[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology , 2016, 41(11): 58-61.

[2]刘伟, 刘红生, 邢忠文, 等. 高强钢板冲压成形的回弹规律与工艺参数研究[J]. 材料科学与工艺, 2010, 18(6): 758-761.

Liu W, Liu H S, Xing Z W, et al. Study on process parameters and springback rule for stamping of high strength steel sheet. [J]. Materials Science & Technology, 2010,18(6): 758-761.

[3]李贵, 柳玉起, 柯俊逸, 等. 先进高强度钢板DP590回弹试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 锻压技术, 2013, 38(5): 50-55.

Li G, Liu Y Q, Ke J Y, et al. Experimental research and numerical simulation of springback for advanced high-strengh steel-DP590[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology,2013,38(5): 50-55.

[4]张琪. 乘用车地板通道零件回弹及起皱特性分析[J]. 锻压技术, 2015, 40(6): 34-38.

Zhang Q. Analysis on springback and wrinkle of car floor channel part[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2015, 40(6): 34-38.

[5]徐刚, 李建军, 付秀娟,等. 成形速度及载荷对高强度钢板回弹影响的研究[J]. 锻压技术, 2012, 37(2): 15-20.

Xu G, Li J J, Fu X J, et al. Research on influence of forming speed and load on springback for high strength steel sheet[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology , 2012, 37(2): 15-20.

[6]杨俊英, 运新兵, 赵颖,等. 型腔结构对AZ31镁合金连续挤压扩展成形规律的影响[J]. 稀有金属, 2016,40(4): 307-314.

Yang J Y, Yun X B, Zhao Y, et al. Expansion forming of AZ31 magnesium alloy with two types of cavity structures during continuous extrusion process[J].Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 2016,40(4): 307-314.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】