锻压技术

基于数值模拟和试验设计的拉延工艺参数优化

英文标题：Optimization on drawing process parameters based on numerical simulation and experiment design

作者：张晓旭杜子学

分类号：TG386.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2018,43(6):180-184

摘要：

针对汽车薄板冲压件成形中容易出现的开裂和起皱的缺陷，借助AutoForm建立汽车地板零件的拉延成形的有限元模型，将数值模拟和试验设计相结合，以压边力、压机速度和摩擦因数为设计变量，采用正交试验对汽车地板零件的拉延成形工艺参数进行试验设计。先采用单因素试验确定设计变量的大致范围，再进行正交试验设计，最后按照设计的试验组进行数值模拟。试验分析中主要考察了最大减薄率和起皱准则。最后，采用多目标多约束来求解最优的工艺参数组合，得到优化的参数组合为：压边力为1.5×106 N，压机速度为5 mm·s-1，摩擦因数为0.12。通过实验验证得到实际试模零件和数值模拟分析结果基本一致，表明采用该方法可以有效地用于冲压模具开发中成形工艺参数的确定。

For the defects of cracking and wrinkling easily occurring in the forming of automotive sheet metal stamping, the finite element model of drawing forming of automobile floor part was established by software AutoForm taking blank holder force, press speed and friction factor as design variables, and the drawing process parameters of automotive floor part were designed by the orthogonal test combining numerical simulation and experimental design. Furthermore, the approximate range of the design variables was determined by single factor test, and the orthogonal test design was carried out. Finally, the numerical simulation was conducted according to the designed test group based on the maximum thinning ratio and wrinkling criteria. In the end, the optimal combination of process parameters were solved by the multiobjective and multiconstraint method, and the optimized parameters including blank holder force of 1.5×106 N, press speed of 5 mm·s-1 and friction factor of 0.12 were obtained. Through experimental verification, the actual test parts and numerical simulation results were basically the same. It shows that the method can be effectively used to determine the forming process parameters in the development of stamping dies.

基金项目：

国家科技支撑计划项目（2013BAG06B01）

张晓旭(1982-)，女，硕士，讲师；Email：zxx15696212212@163.com

参考文献：

［1］胡晓, 刁可山, 李雷. Dynaform与Autoform在铝板冲压成形模拟中的比较
［J］. 塑性工程学报, 2017, 24(3):31-35.

Hu X, Diao K S, Li L. Comparison of Dynaform with Autoform in the simulation of aluminum sheet stamping
［J］. Journal of Plasticity Engineering,2017,24(3):31-35.

［2］谭海林, 郭照宇, 孟少明. 基于Dynaform的高强钢板冲压回弹补偿分析
［J］. 锻压装备与制造技术, 2014, 49(4):65-67.

Tan H L，Guo Z Y，Meng S M. The analysis of stamping spring back compensation for high strength steel based on Dynaform
［J］. Forging Equipment and Manufacturing Techniques, 2014, 49 (4): 65-67.

［3］乔晓勇,成艾国,苏飞宇，等. 汽车外覆盖件的回弹仿真及工程控制方法
［J］.锻压技术,2017,42(3):35-39,51.

Qiao X Y, Cheng A G, Su F Y, et al. Simulation and engineering control method of springback for auto exterior panels
［J］. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2017,42(3):35-39,51.

［4］陈志珺,刘渝,蔡江,等. 基于Dynaform的汽车前托架成形分析及参数优化
［J］. 锻压技术,2017,42(6):174-179.

Chen Z J, Liu Y, Cai J, et al. Forming analysis and parameter optimization for automobilefront bracket based on Dynaform
［J］.Forging & Stamping Technology, 2017, 42(6):174-179.

［5］于锁清,张莉萍,倪利勇,等. 基于AutoForm软件的应变硬化指数对前罩内板成形影响的数值模拟
［J］. 热加工工艺,2017,(19):132-135.

Yu S Q, Zhang L P, Ni L Y, et al. Numerical simulation of automobile cover plate stamping based on AutoForm
［J］. Hot Working Technology, 2017, (19):132-135.

［6］黄忠辉,黄瑶,王雷刚, 等. 基于灰色关联的皮卡尾门外板的拉延工艺参数优化
［J］. 锻压技术,2017,42(6):39-43.

Huang Z H, Huang Y, Wang L G, et al. Optimization on drawing process parameters for pickup tailgate outer panel based on gray relational analysis
［J］. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2017, 42(6):39-43.

［7］郑金辉. 基于Deform的汽车仪表板支架冲压模具有限元分析
［J］. 吉林化工学院学报,2016,33(9):52-56.

Zheng J H. Finite element analysis of stamping die for automobile instrument panel bracket based on Deform software
［J］. Journal of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, 2016, 33(9):52-56.

［8］涂小文. AutoForm原理技巧与战例实用手册
［M］. 武汉：湖北科学技术出版社, 2013.

Tu X W. AutoForm Principles Techniques and Examples in Practical Handbook
［M］. Wuhan:Hubei Science and Technology Press, 2013.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】