锻压技术

基于六西格玛与形态学矩阵的润滑系统结构设计

英文标题：Structural design on lubrication system based on Six Sigma and morphological matrix

作者：曹磊龚红英李孟祥廖泽寰

单位：1.上海工程技术大学材料工程学院上海 200240 2.上海东芙冷锻制造股份有限公司上海 201100

分类号：TP202

出版年,卷(期):页码：2019,44(5):126-130

摘要：

针对汽车挤压类零件常用的传统磷化工艺逐步被新型润滑剂所取代，为匹配新润滑工艺润滑系统的市场需要，进行了产品结构设计。以六西格玛（6σ）设计方法为指导，以形态学矩阵为方法进行方案设计，对热处理工业炉、输送结构和润滑结构进行了参数化分析，由此构建了形态学矩阵，得出144种待选方案，并依据理论研究与企业实际调研评选出5种典型方案，采用专家一致性评价方法及机械设计学技术评价方法进行了方案优选，得到最佳方案。最终对六西格玛（6σ）设计原则进行了方案验证，确定5号方案为最佳方案，即辐射式连续热处理工业炉、链网式输送网带配合摆线针轮减速机的输送结构、气动式多电机搅拌润滑机构。

The traditional phosphating process commonly used for automotive extrusion parts has been gradually replaced by new lubricants. In order to match the market needs of lubrication system for new lubrication process, the product structure design was carried out. Guided by the design method of Six Sigma (6σ), the design scheme was conducted by the morphological matrix, and the three main equipments of heat treatment industrial furnace, transmission structure and lubrication structure were analyzed parametrically. Then, the morphological matrix was constructed to obtain 144 kinds of alternative schemes, and five typical schemes were selected based on theoretical research and actual enterprise research. Furthermore, the optimized scheme was conducted by the expert consistency evaluation method and mechanical design technical evaluation method, and the best solution was obtained. Finally, the design scheme was verified by the design principle of Six Sigma (6σ), and the No.5 scheme was determined as the best solution, namely, the radiant continuous heat treatment industrial furnace, the transmission structure of the chain mesh conveyor belt with the cycloidal pin wheel reducer, and the pneumatic multimotor stirring lubrication mechanism.

基金项目：

校企产学合作项目（（17）CL-003）

作者简介：曹磊（1994-），男，硕士研究生 Email：2734059445@qq.com  通讯作者：龚红英（1974-），女，博士，教授,硕士生导师 Email:ghyyw1974@163.com

参考文献：

［2］Sebastian Kozioek, Damian Derlukiewicz. Method of assessing the quality of the design process of construction equipment with the use of DFSS (Design for six Sigma)
［J］. Automation in Construction,2012,22(5):223-232.

［3］Li Y H, Hu M G,W J. Six Sigma robust optimization of fatigue life for the passenger car battery hanging device
［J］.Journal of Donghua University(English Edition),2016,33(2):223-226.[ZK)]〖JP〗

［4］Adrian Pugna, Romeo Negrea, Serban Miclea. Using six Sigma methodology to improve the assembly process in an automotive company
［J］. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences,2016,221(5):308-316.[ZK)]

［5］Sri Indrawati, Muhammad Ridwansyah. Manufacturing continuous improvement using lean six sigma: [JP2]An iron ores industry case application
［J］. Procedia Manufacturing,2015,4(5):528-534. [ZK)][JP]

［6］王章忠.金属磷化技术的环境协调性改善
［J］.新技术新工艺,2003,(5):44-46.

Wang Z Z. Improvement of environmental coordination of metal phosphating technology
［J］. New Technology & New Process, 2003,(5): 44-46.[ZK)]

［7］李昕瞳.现代机械设计的创新方法
［J］.科技创新与应用,2018,(8):41-42.

Li X T. Innovative method of modern mechanical design
［J］. Technology Innovation and Application,2018,(8):41-42.[ZK)]

［8］宋金鹏.基于形态学矩阵理论的搓背椅名称及机构设计
［J］.运城学院学报,2009,27(2):38-39. 

Song J P. Name and mechanism design of the back chair based on morphology matrix theory
［J］.Journal of Yuncheng University,2009,27(2):38-39.[ZK)]

［9］竺志超,陈元斌,韩豫.非标自动化设备设计与实践
［M］.北京：国防工业出版社,2015.

Zhu Z C, Chen Y B, Han Y. Design and Practice of Nonstandard Automation Equipment
［M］. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 2015.[ZK)]

［10］王海伟,刘更,杨占铎.机械产品设计方案多指标综合评价方法
［J］.哈尔滨工业大学学报,2014,46(3):99-103. 

Wang H W, Liu G, Yang Z D. Multiindex comprehensive evaluation method for mechanical product design scheme
［J］.Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 46(3): 99-103. [ZK)]

［11］苗鸿宾,刘钊.机械系统概念设计方案评价方法研究
［J］.机械传动,2008, (1):37-42. 

Miao H B, Liu Z. Research on evaluation method of mechanical system conceptual design scheme
［J］. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2008, (1): 37-42. [ZK)]

［12］谢先明,杨迎春.物资采购中专家评标一致性的评价方法研究
［J］.物流科技,2016,39(1):50-54.

Xie X M, Yang Y C. Research on evaluation method of expert bidding consistency in material purchasing
［J］. Logistics SciTech, 2016, 39(1): 50-54.[ZK)]

［13］姚环宇,于随然.多目标机械设计的方案评价
［J］.机械设计与制造,2013,(12):256-258. 

Yao H Y, Yu S R. Appraisal of multiobjective mechanical design
［J］.Machinery Design & Manufacture,2013,(12):256-258.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】