锻压技术

一种基于预压弯的新型扭力梁回弹补偿方法

英文标题：A springback compensation method on new torsion beam based on pre-compression bending

单位：1.中国航发沈阳黎明航空发动机有限责任公司 2.北京航空航天大学机械工程及自动化学院 3.隆昌山川机械有限责任公司

分类号：TG306

出版年,卷(期):页码：2022,47(6):118-124

摘要：

针对一种新型轴线带弯曲特点的扭力梁成形，给出了其两步充液成形的工艺参数，并利用有限元模拟软件给出了对成形质量的预测。结果表明，在最大支撑压力为55 MPa、最大整形压力为295 MPa、推头补给量为15 mm的工艺参数组合下，其成形无破裂和起皱风险。此外，对该零件轴线易发生的Z向回弹进行了模拟研究。结果显示，该零件成形后存在5 mm以上的偏差量。基于此，提出了一种预成形前预压补偿的回弹补偿方法，通过数值模拟实验和零件试制对该方法进行了验证。结果表明，该种方法可以将Z向回弹控制在0.6 mm以内，能够满足精度要求，为之后管类零件成形的回弹控制提供了参照。

For the forming of a new type of torsion beam with bending characteristics on axis, the process parameters of its two-step hydroforming were given, and the prediction of forming quality was given by finite element simulation software. The results show that under the combination of process parameters for the maximum supporting pressure of 55 MPa, the maximum shaping pressure of 295 MPa and the feeding amount of 15 mm at both ends for tube, there is no risk of cracking and wrinkling in forming process. In addition, the Z-direction springback that is prone to occur in the axis of part was studied by simulation. The results show that there is a deviation of more than 5 mm after the part is formed. Based on this, a springback compensation method for pre-compression compensation before pre-forming was proposed, which was verified by numerical simulation experiments and part trial production. The results show that this method can control the springback in the Z-direction within 0.6 mm to meet the accuracy requirements and provide a reference for the springback control of subsequent tube part forming.

基金项目：

四川省科技计划项目（2019YFSY0034）

李晓光（1981-），男，博士，高级工程师 E-mail：lixiaoguang9250@163.com 通信作者：郎利辉（1970-），男，博士，教授 E-mail：lang@buaa.edu.cn

参考文献：

[1]Lang L H, Wang Z R, Kang D C, et al. Hydroforming highlights: Sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology， 2004,151(1-3):165-177.

[2]Koc M, Altan T. Overall review of the tube hydroforming technology[J]. Journal of Material Processing and Technology, 2001, 108(3): 384-393.

[3]Bartley G R, Evert R. Hydroforming of aluminum extrusions for automotive applications[J]. Light Metal Age, 2000, 58(7):24-37.

[5]Stich A. Hydroforming of aluminum and magnesium sheet at evaluated temperature for automotive lightweight construction[J]. VDI Berichte, 2004, (1833):71-78.

[6]靳永力. 某轿车扭力梁胀压成形仿真研究[D]. 秦皇岛:燕山大学, 2016.

Jin Y L. Study on Simulation of Bulgingpressing Torsion Beam[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2016.

[7]韩聪, 张伟玮, 苑世剑,等. 预制坯形状对扭力梁内高压成形的影响分析[J]. 材料科学与工艺, 2011, 19(4):1-5.

Han C, Zhang W W, Yuan S J, et al. The effect of preform shape on hydroforming of a torsion beam[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2011, 19(4):1-5.

[8]韩聪, 贺久强, 苑世剑. 780 MPa超高强钢扭力梁内高压成形研究[J]. 精密成形工程, 2016, 8(5):53-59.

Han C, He J Q, Yuan S J. Hydroforming of an automotive torsion beam with 780 MPa advanced high strength steel[J]. Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering, 2016, 8(5):53-59.

[9]袁智军, 王文渊, 程鹏志. 基于模糊控制的扭力梁充液成形工艺研究[J]. 机电产品开发与创新, 2020, 33(5):24-26.

Yuan Z J, Wang W Y, Cheng P Z. Hydroforming process optimization based on fuzzy logic controlling[J]. Development & Innovation of Machinery & Electrical Products, 2020, 33(5):24-26.

[10]韦明凤, 李峰华, 谢亚苏,等. U形扭力梁充液成形技术研究[J]. 机电产品开发与创新, 2020, 33(5):20-23.

Wei M F, Li F H, Xie Y S, et al. Research on hydroforming a Utype torsion beam[J]. Development & Innovation of Machinery & Electrical Products, 2020, 33(5):20-23.

[11]谢晖. 基于CAE仿真的冲压回弹影响因素研究[J]. 湖南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2003, 30(5):29-34.

Xie H. Analysis of factors infecting sheet′s springback based on CAE[J]. Journal of Hunan University: Natural Sciences, 2003, 30 (5):29-34.

[12]苑世剑. 现代液压成形技术[M]. 北京：国防工业出版社, 2009.

[4]Imaninejad M, Subhash G, Loukus A. Loading path optimization of tube hydroforming process[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2005, 45(12-13):1504-1514.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】