网站首页期刊简介编委会过刊目录投稿指南广告合作征订与发行联系我们English
相变诱导塑性钢高应变速率性能和失效行为分析
英文标题:Analysis on high strain rate properties and failure behavior of transformation induced plasticity steel
作者:于沛 夏卿 
单位:黄河科技学院 
关键词:相变诱导塑性钢 应变速率 微观组织 力学性能 断裂失效 
分类号:U463.83;U461.91
出版年,卷(期):页码:2023,48(4):256-264
摘要:

 以TRIP590钢为研究对象,对静态和高应变速率下的力学性能进行测试,获取性能变化规律,并对应变速率相关本构模型进行拟合;采用剪切、中心孔拉伸、缺口拉伸、穿孔等5种试样来表征材料在拉伸、剪切及复合状态下的失效行为,并采用MMC断裂失效模型进行拟合;将材料模型应用于不同试样模型,开展断裂试验仿真,并与试验测试结果进行对比,以验证失效模型的精度;采用高速冲击折弯进行试验,验证模型的准确性。结果表明:TRIP590钢具有良好的延展性,断后伸长率可达35.5%,强塑积达到21.66 GPa%;具有较强的应变速率敏感性,随着应变速率的增加,其强度不断增加,而且材料的伸长率也不断提高;随着应变速率的提升,材料吸收的能量逐渐增加;设计的5种断裂失效测试试样可以表征材料的失效行为;应用MMC断裂失效模型仿真所得的断裂形貌与试验结果相符,关键参数仿真与试验测试结果的平均误差均小于5.5%;拟合获得材料本构模型用于冲击折弯的仿真结果与实测结果基本一致,误差控制在3%以内,可以较好地反应材料的力学特征。

 For TRIP590 steel, the mechanical properties under static and high strain rates were tested to obtain the change rules of properties, and the constitutive models related to strain rates were fitted. Furthermore, the failure behaviors of material in tensile, shear and composite states were characterized by five kinds of specimens, such as shear, central hole tension, notched tension and perforation, and fitted by the MMC fracture failure model. The material model was used to different sample models, and the fracture test simulation was carried out, the results was compared with the test results to verify the accuracy of the failure model. Finally, the accuracy of the model was verified by high speed impact bending test. The results show that TRIP590 steel has good ductility, the elongation after fracture is 35.5%, the strong plastic product reaches 21.66 GPa%, which has strong strain rate sensitivity. With the increasing of strain rate, its strength increases, and the elongation of material also increases. With the increasing of strain rate, the energy absorbed by the material increases gradually. Five kinds of fracture failure test samples designed can reflect the failure behavior of materials. The fracture morphology simulated by MMC fracture failure model is consistent with the test results, and the average error between the key parameter simulation and test results is less than 5.5%. The simulation result of impact bending by fitting obtained material constitutive model is basically consistent with the measured results, and the error is controlled within 3%, which can better reflect the mechanical characteristics of the material.

基金项目:
河南省民办普通高等学校品牌专业建设项目(ZLG201901)
作者简介:
作者简介:于沛(1983-),男,学士,讲师 E-mail:hnlyj980@126.com
参考文献:

 
[1]王文英, 王慧,曲世永.相变诱导塑性钢TRIP590的烘烤硬化特性
[J].金属热处理,2020,45(8):43-46.


Wang W Y, Wang H, Qu S Y. Bake hardening behavior of transformation induced plasticity steel TRIP590
[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(8):43-46.


[2]董丹阳, 刘杨,王磊,等. 应变速率对DP780钢动态拉伸变形行为的影响
[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49(2):159-166.

Dong D Y, Liu Y, Wang L, et al. Effect of strain rate on dynamic deformation behavior of DP780 steel
[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2013, 49(2):159-166.


[3]张伟, 李春光,韩赟,等. 高强双相钢动态力学本构模型对比分析
[J]. 塑性工程学报,2021,28(6):75-82. 

Zhang W, Li C G, Han Y, et al. Comparative analysis of dynamic mechanical constitutive model of high strength dual phase steel
[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2021, 28(6):75-82.


[4]张赛, 孟庆振, 谢书港,等. B250P1低合金钢的动态力学行为及其本构模型
[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2016, 52(6):370-374.

Zhang S, Meng Q Z, Xie S G, et al. Dynamic mechanical behavior and constitutive model of B250P1 low alloy steel
[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part A: Physical Testing, 2016, 52(6):370-374.


[5]黄东英, 徐亮, 刘晓红. 冲击载荷下中碳低合金钢的动态力学性能与J-C本构模型的改进
[J]. 锻压技术, 2021,46 (11): 225-230.

Huang D Y, Xu L, Liu X H. Dynamic mechanical properties of medium carbon low alloy steel and improvement of J-C constitutive model under impact load
[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2021,46 (11): 225-230.


[6]熊自柳, 吝章国, 孙力,等. 汽车用高强度钢板的动态变形行为
[J]. 机械工程材料, 2018, 42(8):18-23,36.

Xiong Z L, Lin Z G, Sun L, et al. Dynamic deformation behaviour of high strength steel sheet for automotive
[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 42(8):18-23,36.


[7]Nieto-fuentes J C, Rittel D, Osovski S. On a dislocation-based constitutive model and dynamic thermomechanical considerations
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2018,(8): 601-615.


[8]赵清江, 郭怡晖, 梁宾,等. 22MnB5高强度钢板材的断裂失效准则研究
[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2020, 27(4): 132-137.

Zhang Q J, Guo Y H, Liang B, et al. Research on fracture criterion of 22MnB5 high-strength steel plate
[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2020, 27(4): 132-137.


[9]韩蒙, 李迪, 孙彩凤,等. 基于修正GTN模型的双相钢断裂失效判据研究
[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2020, 27(1): 117-122.

Han M, Li D, Sun C F, et al. Study on fracture failure criterion of dual phase steel based on modified GTN model
[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2020, 27(1): 117-122.


[10]GB/T 228.1—2021, 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法
[S].

GB/T 228.1—2021, Metallic material—Tensile testing—Part 1: Method of test at room temperature
[S].


[11]GB/T 30069.2—2016,金属材料高应变速率拉伸试验第2部分:液压伺服型与其他类型试验系统
[S].

GB/T 30069.2—2016, Metallic material—Tensile testing at high strain rates—Part 2: Servo-hydraulic and other test systems
[S].


[12]徐梅, 米振莉, 李辉,等. 基于位错密度理论的超高强双相钢DP1000热变形本构模型
[J]. 材料研究学报, 2017, 32(8):576-584.

Xu M, Mi Z L, Li H, et al. Constitutive model based on dislocation density theory for hot deformation behavior of ultra-high strength dual phase steel DP1000
[J]. Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 2017, 32(8):576-584.


[13]高永亮, 胡士廉, 陈巍,等. 高应变速率拉伸条件下TWIP钢动态力学性能与组织演变规律的研究
[J]. 热加工工艺, 2019, 48(16):56-60.

Gao Y L, Hu S L, Chen W, et al. Research on dynamic mechanical behavior and microstructure evolution rule of TWIP steel under high strain rate tensile condition
[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2019, 48(16):56-60.


[14]许伟, 方刚, 张钧萍,等. 面向汽车碰撞安全的热成形钢断裂失效表征与验证
[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2020, 27(6): 121-128.

Xu W,Fang G, Zhang J P, et al. Fracture failure characterization and verification of hot forming steel for vehicle crash safety
[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2020, 27(6):121-128.


[15]伍星星, 刘建湖, 孟利平, 等. 金属材料试件在压缩,扭转,拉伸断裂过程中的应力状态变化及表征
[J]. 高压物理学报, 2020, 34(5):143-152.

Wu X X, Liu J H, Meng L P, et al. Variation of stress distribution in metal fracture process under compressive, torsional, and tensile loading
[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(5):143-152.


[16]罗玉梅, 王博, 李伟. 基于落锤压溃高强双相钢断裂失效模型
[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2021, 28(9):200-206.

Luo Y M, Wang B, Li W. Fracture failure model of high-strength dual-phase steel based on falling weight collapse
[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2021, 28(9):200-206.


[17]冯悦, 肖守讷, 朱涛,等. 考虑材料失效准则的吸能装置失效行为与碰撞特性
[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 50(2):487-496.

Feng Y, Xiao S N, Zhu T, et al. Failure behavior and collision characteristics of energy-absorbing structures considering material failure criteria
[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2019, 50(2):487-496.
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
《锻压技术》编辑部版权所有

中国机械工业联合会主管  中国机械总院集团北京机电研究所有限公司 中国机械工程学会主办
联系地址:北京市海淀区学清路18号 邮编:100083
电话:+86-010-82415085 传真:+86-010-62920652
E-mail: fst@263.net(稿件) dyjsjournal@163.com(广告)
京ICP备07007000号-9