网站首页期刊简介编委会过刊目录投稿指南广告合作征订与发行联系我们English
基于响应面法冲压工艺过程图应用研究
英文标题:Application research on stamping process drawing based on response surface method
作者:马旭东1 侯国东2 李昕1 
单位:1.长春汽车工业高等专科学校 机械工程学院 2.一汽富维零部件股份有限公司冲压件分公司 技术部 
关键词:汽车内板件 冲压 工艺过程图 模具调试 减薄率 
分类号:TG386.3
出版年,卷(期):页码:2024,49(4):90-96
摘要:

 针对一汽主机厂汽车内板件模具在调试过程中存在的调试效率低、工艺寻优困难、过度依赖人员经验等问题,结合汽车内板件的成形特点,运用Dynaform软件和BoxBehnken设计模拟不同工艺参数下板料的成形过程,采用响应面法建立压边力、拉延筋阻力系数、摩擦因数与产品减薄率之间的二次拟合模型,从而获得合理的工艺参数,完成二元工艺过程图的绘制。结合模型开展全面试验法,以三角形为边界区域完成三元工艺过程图的绘制。试验结果表明,利用响应面法建立的工艺过程图能够真实地反映板料冲压成形过程中产品的减薄率情况,并对模具调试人员在实际生产中有着很强的指导作用。

 In view of the problems of low debugging efficiency, difficulty in process optimization and over-reliance on personnel experience in the debugging process of automobile inner panels die in FAW main engine factory, combined with the forming characteristics of automobile inner panels, the forming process of sheet metal under different process parameters was simulated by Dynaform software and Box-Behnken design, and the response surface method was used to establish the quadratic fitting model between blank holder force, resistance coefficient of drawing rib, friction factor and thinning rate of product so as to obtain reasonable process parameters and complete the binary process drawing. Then, the ternary process drawing was completed by a comprehensive test method combined with the model taking the triangle as the boundary region. Test results demonstrate that the process drawing established by the response surface method can accurately reflect the thinning rate of product in the stamping process of sheet metal, and provide valuable guidance to die debugging staff in the actual production. 

基金项目:
长春市科技局市属高校专项(21ST04);一汽富维校企产学研项目(2023084)
作者简介:
作者简介:马旭东(1987-),男,硕士,中级讲师 E-mail:279667122@qq.com
参考文献:

 [1]尤晋,龚红英,刘尚保,等.基于Dynaform及响应面法的6016铝合金散热壳体冲压成形及优化[J].锻压技术, 2022, 47(3): 54-58.


 

You J, Gong H Y, Liu S B, et al. Stamping forming and optimization of 6016 aluminum alloy cooling shell based on Dynaform and response surface method [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2022, 47(3): 54-58.

 

[2]孙元贵,刘泓滨,周双宁.基于响应面法和GS理论的板料成形优化[J].锻压装备与制造技术,2017, 52(1): 80-84.

 

Sun Y G, Liu H B, Zhou S N. Optimization of sheet forming based on response surface method and GS theory[J]. China Metalforming Equipment & Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 52(1): 80-84.

 

[3]韩龙帅,郑学斌,李学涛,等.冲压模具调试板料流入量影响因素分析[J].塑性工程学报,2022,29(7):82-86.

 

Han L S, Zheng X B, Li X T, et al. Analysis of factors influencing the inflow of plate material for stamping die commissioning[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2022, 29(7): 82-86.

 

[4]张冀川.拉伸模调试缺陷及解决方案[J].模具制造,2018,18(9):33-35.

 

Zhang J C. Tension die commissioning defects and solutions [J]. Die & Mould Manufacture, 2018, 18(9): 33-35.

 

[5]刘强,俞国燕,梅端.基于Dynaform与RBFNSGAII算法的冲压成形工艺参数多目标优化[J].塑性工程学报, 2020, 27(3): 16-25.

 

Liu Q, Yu G Y, Mei D. Multiobjective optimization of stamping and forming process parameters based on Dynaform and RBFNSGAII algorithms [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2020, 27(3): 16-25.

 

[6]赵洪林,姜金花,赵永顺,等.基于熵权TOPSIS决策的汽车吸能盒冲压成形质量多目标优化[J].锻压技术, 2023, 48(10): 67-74.

 

Zhao H L, Jiang J H, Zhao Y S, et al. Multiobjective optimization of forming quality of automotive energy absorption box based on entropy weight TOPSIS decision[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2023, 48(10): 67-74.

 

[7]夏玉峰,陈邦华,杨建兵,等.工艺相图在汽车内板件冲压工艺设计中的应用[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2014,42(2):292-297.

 

Xia Y F, Chen B H, Yang J B, et al. Application of process phase diagram in the design of stamping process for automotive inner plate parts[J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2014, 42(2): 292-297.

 

[8]闫盖,郑燕萍,何镇罡,等.冲压板料可成形性区域图的研究与应用[J].锻压技术, 2013, 38(4): 40-44.

 

Yan G, Zheng Y P, He Z G, et al. Research and application of formability region diagram of stamping sheet [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2013, 38(4): 40-44.

 

[9]崔俊佳,胡明,李光耀.汽车零部件热成形极限裕度云图的构建与应用[J].中国机械工程,2017,28(3):358-365.

 

Cui J J, Hu M, Li G Y. Construction and application of thermal forming limit margin cloud map for automobile parts [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 28(3): 358-365.

 

[10]Cheol D K, Cha S H, Lee S K, et al. Application of a feasible formability diagram for the effective design in stamping processes of automotive panels[J]. Materials & Design, 2009, 31(3): 1262-1275.

 

[11]Zhang J W, Xu Y W, Hu P, et al. Development and applications of formingconditionbased formability diagram for split concerns in stamping[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2015, 17: 151-161.

 

[12]姚忠,谭鹤群,叶金虎.响应面法优化SKD11电火花线切割工艺参数研究[J].制造技术与机床,2019,(9): 91-94.

 

Yao Z, Tan H Q, Ye J H. Study on optimization of SKD11 EDM wirecutting process parameters by response surface method [J]. Manufacturing Technology & Machine Tool, 2019, (9): 91-94.

 

[13]王刚,王馨,宋小三,等.响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较[J].环境工程学报, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511.

 

Wang G, Wang X, Song X S, et al. Comparison of BBD and CCD in response surface method for optimizing the preparation conditions of mercaptoacetylated chitosan[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511.

 

[14]高志国,徐流杰.基于响应面法的700 MPa高强度低合金钢带冷冲压回弹分析[J].热加工工艺,2018, 47(17): 147-150.

 

Gao Z G, Xu L J. Cold stamping rebound analysis of 700 MPa highstrength lowalloy steel strip based on response surface method[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47(17): 147-150.

 

[15]徐天娇,张天寅,韩先洪.基于响应面法的铝合金波纹管热屈曲成形工艺参数分析[J].塑性工程学报, 2022, 29(9): 69-79.

 

Xu T J, Zhang T Y, Han X H. Analysis of thermal buckling forming process parameters of aluminum alloy bellows based on response surface method[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2022, 29(9): 69-79.

 

[16]郎利辉,杨希英,孙志莹,等.基于响应面法的汽车覆盖件充液成形工艺参数多目标优化[J].汽车工程, 2015, 37(4): 480-484.

 

Lang L H, Yang X Y, Sun Z Y, et al. Multiobjective optimization of automotive covering part fluidfilled forming process parameters based on response surface method[J]. Automotive Engineering,2015, 37(4): 480-484.

 

[17]王俊,王克鲁,鲁世强,等.基于响应面法的NiTi形状记忆合金热成形工艺参数优化[J].塑性工程学报, 2022, 29(6): 157-164.

 

Wang J, Wang K R, Lu S Q, et al. Optimization of NiTi shape memory alloy hot forming process parameters based on response surface method [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2022, 29(6): 157-164.

 

[18]马旭东,高文嫱,谢允聪.基于RSM和GAPSO塑件变形优化[J].塑料工业, 2020, 48(11): 66-70,50.

 

Ma X D, Gao W Q, Xie Y C. Deformation optimization of plastic parts based on RSM and GAPSO [J]. China Plastics Industry, 2020, 48(11): 66-70,50.

 

[19]靳鹏伟,石荣莹.利用三元等高线图研究表面活性剂配方和温度对黏度的影响[J].中国洗涤用品工业,2021,(4):38-43.

 

Jin P W, Shi R Y. Study on the effect of surfactant formulation and temperature on viscosity using ternary contour plots[J]. China Cleaning Industry, 2021,(4): 38-43.

 

[20]丁永祥,夏巨谌,王英,等.塑性有限元分析中的等值线图生成算法[J].计算机辅助工程, 1993,(4): 69,71-76.

 

Ding Y X, Xia J C, Wang Y, et al. An algorithm for contour map generation in plastic finite element analysis[J]. Computer Aided Engineering, 1993,(4): 69,71-76.

 
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
《锻压技术》编辑部版权所有

中国机械工业联合会主管  中国机械总院集团北京机电研究所有限公司 中国机械工程学会主办
联系地址:北京市海淀区学清路18号 邮编:100083
电话:+86-010-82415085 传真:+86-010-62920652
E-mail: fst@263.net(稿件) dyjsjournal@163.com(广告)
京ICP备07007000号-9