锻压技术

基于数值模拟的油箱底壳拉延筋设置与优化

英文标题：Design and optimization of drawbead of oil pan drawing based on numerical simulation

单位：长春工业大学

分类号：TG386

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,39(12):31-35

摘要：

针对油箱底壳零件在冲压成形过程中产生的起皱、破裂、成形不充分等缺陷，利用Dynaform软件对油箱底壳冲压过程进行数值模拟，分析拉延筋的设置对油箱底壳成形质量的影响。模拟结果表明，可以利用等效拉延筋确定其合理的工艺参数,采用分段拉延筋比采用均布拉延筋更符合零件的拉深成形要求；模拟优化后的分段半圆截面拉延筋高度和半径分别为筋一、筋三H=2 mm，R=3 mm，筋二、筋四H=5 mm，R=3 mm；确定了真实拉延筋模拟更能反应零件的成形状态。之后采用真实分段拉延筋进行拉深成形试模。结果表明，工件成形效果良好，修边区域内无褶皱、破裂等成形缺陷，零件最大减薄率为20.3%。

For the defects of wrinkling, rupture and the inadequate forming in the drawing process of oil pan, the drawing process of oil pan was numerical simulated by Dynaform software, and the influence of drawbead setting on the quality of oil pan drawing was discussed. The simulation results show that the reasonable process parameters can be gained by equivalent drawbead. The segmented drawbead is more conformed to the requirements of the drawing than equispaced drawbead. The height and radius of the optimized segmented semicircle drawbead were H=2 mm, R=3 mm for drawbead 1 and drawbead 3 respectivly, H=5 mm, R=3 mm for drawbead 2 and drawbead 4. The real simulation of drawbeads that better reflecting the state of the drawing parts is determined. Then, the real segmented drawbead drawing was adopted in the test. The results show that the forming effect of the part is good without drawing defects of folds or rupture in the trimming area, and the maximum thinning rate of parts is 20.3%.

基金项目：

吉林省教育厅“十二五”科学技术研究项目（吉教科合字[2011]第89号）

李奇涵（1970-），男，博士，教授

参考文献：

[1]张士宏，程幸叶，唐杰.汽车覆盖件成形拉深筋的有限元模拟与优化[J].锻压技术,2008，33(6): 140-143.

Zhang S H, Cheng X Y, Tang J. Design and optimization of drawbead of automotive panels by FE simulation[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2008，33(6): 140-143.

[2]林忠钦.车身覆盖件冲压成形仿真[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004.

Lin Z Q. Stamping Simulation of Automobile Body Panels[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2005.

[3]李金燕,傅建,彭必友，等.基于数值模拟的等效拉延筋设计与优化[J].塑性工程学报，2007,14(5)：14-17，

Li J Y，Fu J, Peng B Y，et al. Design and optimization of the equivalent drawbead based on numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2007,14(5)：14-17.

[4]陈文亮.板料成形CAE分析教程[M].北京:机械工业出版社，2005.

Chen W L. Sheet Metal Forming CAE Analysis Tutorial[M].Beijing: China Machine Press,2005.

[5]Demeri M Y. Drawbeads in sheet metal forming[J].J. Mater.Eng.Perform,1993,2(6):863-866.

[6]黄桂美,詹艳然.等效拉延筋模型及其在板料成形数值模拟中的应用[J].现代制造工程,2005，(10):57-58.

Huang G M,Zhan Y R. Modeling of equivalent drawbead and its application to the numerical simulation of sheet metal forming[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering,2005，(10):57-58.

[7]胡金华,史艳国,张涛，等.半球形件冲压成形拉深筋影响研究[J].塑性工程学报,2001,8(1):43-46.

Hu J H,Shi Y G,Zhang T. et al. Research on drawbead′s influence during half spherical part′s forming process[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2001,8(1):43-46.

[8]霞正保,付爱军,黄冲，等.拉延筋模拟方法对覆盖件CAE结果影响的工业试验[J].汽车工程，2004,26(1)：73-77.

Xia Z B,Fu A J,Huang C, et al. A study on the effect of different simulation methods for drawbead on CAE results of Automotive closure panels[J]. Automative Engineering，2004, 26(1)：73-77.

[9]金淼,郭宝峰,李硕本，等.半圆形拉深筋尺寸对其阻力的影响[J].塑性工程学报, 2003,10(1):32-35.

Jin M,Guo B F,Li S B,et al.The relation between circle drawbead restraining force and its dimension parameters[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2003,10 (1):32-35.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】