锻压技术

液室压力对异形长法兰盒形件充液成形过程的影响

英文标题：Influence of cavity pressure on box-shaped part with special-shaped long flanges in hydroforming process

作者：郎利辉张文尚刘康宁杨希英贾新强

单位：北京航空航天大学

关键词：充液成形异形长法兰盒形件仿真液室压力初始反胀

分类号：TG386

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,41(9):41-45

摘要：

异形长法兰盒形件由于法兰面积大，拉深成形时法兰区的材料流动困难，易出现开裂缺陷。通过对比分析壁

厚分布的试验与仿真结果，证明了仿真分析具有可靠的准确度。利用实验与仿真相结合的分析方法，分析异

形长法兰盒形件充液成形过程中初始反胀与成形压力的影响机理，优化液室压力加载路径，建立关于初始反

胀压力与初始反胀高度的工艺窗口，用于指导该类零件初始反胀参数选取。分析结果表明：异形长法兰盒形

件充液成形过程中，初始反胀压力与初始反胀高度过小，导致异形长法兰盒形件凸模圆角处破裂，初始反胀

压力与初始反胀高度过大，导致异形长法兰盒形件凹模圆角处破裂；最大减薄率随着成形压力的增加，先减

小后增加。

Box-shaped part with special-shaped long flanges (BPSLF) is difficult to form and easy to

crack because the flange area is too large to make the materials in the flanges flow

difficultly. Compared simulation of wall thickness distribution with the experiment results,

the simulation agrees with the experimental results well. The influences of cavity pressure

and initial pre-bulging in the hydroforming of BPSLF were analyzed combining experiment result

with simulation result. The loading path of cavity pressure was optimized. The process window

about the pre-bulging pressure and pre-bulging height was built to guide the selection of pre

-bulging parameters of this kind of parts. The results show that when the pre-bulging pressure

and pre-bulging height is too small, the BPSLF will rupture at the round corner of punch.

While, the pre-bulging pressure and pre-bulging height are too large, the BPSLF will rupture

at die corner. With increasing forming pressure, the maximum thinning rate decreases at first

and then increases.

基金项目：

国家科技重大专项（2014ZX04002-071）

郎利辉（1970-），男，博士，教授，博士生导师

参考文献：

［1］李涛，郎利辉,周贤宾. 先进板材液压成形技术及其进展[J]. 塑性工程学报，2006,13(3): 30-34.

Li T, Lang L H, Zhou X B. Advanced sheet metal forming technology and its development[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering，2006,13(3): 30-34.

［2］ Siegert K, Hussermann M, Lsch B, et al. Recent developments in hydroforming technology [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2000, 98(2):251-258.

［3］ Amino H, NaKamura K, Nakagawa T. Counter-pressure deep drwing and its application in the forming of automobile parts[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1990, 23: 243-265.

［4］ Buerk E. Hydromechanical drawing[J]. Sheet Metal Industries, 1967, 44(479): 182-188.

［5］ Lang L, Danckert J, Nielsen K B. Investigation into the effect of pre-bulging during hydro-mechanical deep drawing with uniform pressure onto the blank [J].International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,2004, 44(6):649-657.

［6］杨玉英. 盒形件成形机理的探讨[J]. 锻压技术,1989,14(6):13-17.

Yang Y Y. Discussion on forming mechanism of box shaped parts [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 1989,14(6):13-17.

［7］陈渝, 胡志力, 严勇,等. 矩形盒件拉深成形规律及失效分析[J]. 锻压技术, 2015, 40(8):52-58.

Chen Y, Hu Z L, Yan Y, et al. Analysis on deep drawing forming regularity and failure of rectangular box parts [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2015, 40(8):52-58.

［8］张文瑞, 曹阳根, 杨尚磊,等. DC06钢极限拉深系数测定[J]. 锻压技术, 2014, 39(2)：41-45.

Zhang W R, Cao Y G, Yang S L, et al. Limit drawing coefficient test of DC06 steel[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2014, 39(2)：41-45.

［9］ Lang L H, Wang Y M, Xie Y S, et al. Pre-bulging effect during sheet hydroforming process of aluminum alloy box with unequal height and flat bottom [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22:302-308.

［10］郎利辉, 丁少行, 杨希英,等. 汽车后备箱门内板充液成形数值模拟与试验验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2015,(5):599-604.

Lang L H, Ding S H, Yang X Y, et al. Numerical simulation and test verification of hydroforming for the inner-panel of vehicle trunk door[J].Automotive Engineering,2015, (5):599-604.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】