锻压技术

碳纤维-铝合金电磁铆接与准静态压铆对比

英文标题：Comparison electromagnetic riveting with quasi-static pressure riveting for CFRP-aluminum alloy sheets

作者：李光耀冯雪瑞蒋浩齐麟崔俊佳张旭

分类号：TG391

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,42(4):85-91

摘要：

为了探究电磁铆接技术在碳纤维复合材料上的可行性，采用碳纤维-铝合金结构为研究对象。探究了碳纤维-铝合金电磁铆接接头的干涉量及剪切、拉脱性能，并与传统准静态压铆技术进行了对比。结果表明：无论是Φ4 mm铆钉，还是Φ6 mm 铆钉，电磁铆接结构相对干涉量不仅均匀性更好，而且平均值更高，分别从4.96%提升到5.20%，6.85%提升到7.85%；电磁铆接接头剪切性能有较大提高，对于Φ4 mm铆钉和Φ6 mm铆钉，电磁铆接最大剪切力相比准静态压铆分别提高了19.7%和5.2%；电磁铆接接头拉脱性能有较小提高，对于Φ4 mm铆钉和Φ6 mm铆钉，电磁铆接最大拉脱力相比准静态压铆提高了3.9%和6.6%。结果说明电磁铆接技术更适合复合材料的连接。

In order to explore the feasibility of electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology in carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP), the hybrid CFRP- aluminum alloy structures were taken into account. Then, the interference, shear and pull-out properties of electromagnetic riveted joints were studied, and the comparison with traditional quasi-static riveted (QSR) joints was carried out. The results show that the relative interference for EMR structures is more uniformity, and the average value of interference is higher for both Φ4 mm rivet and Φ6 mm rivet. Specifically, they are increased from 4.96% to 5.20% and from 6.85% to 7.85%, respectively. However, the shear properties of electromagnetic riveted joints are greatly improved. For Φ4 mm rivet and Φ6 mm rivet, the maximum shear loads of electromagnetic riveted joints are 19.7% and 5.2% higher than that of QSR joints, respectively. And the pull-out properties are slightly improved. Furthermore, the maximum pull-out loads of electromagnetic riveted joints is 3.9% and 6.6% higher than that of QSR joints, respectively. The results demonstrate that the EMR technology fits for composites connection more.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金资助项目（61232014，51405149）

李光耀（1963-），男，博士，教授 E-mail：gyl@hnu.edu.cn 通讯作者：张旭（1986-），男，博士，讲师 E-mail：ddzhangxu@126.com

参考文献：

[1]Deb A, Mahendrakumar M S, Chavan C, et al. Design of an aluminium-based vehicle platform for front impact safety [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(8-9): 1055-1079.

[2]郑晖, 赵曦雅. 汽车轻量化及铝合金在现代汽车生产中的应用[J]. 锻压技术, 2016, 41(2): 1-6.

Zheng H, Zhao X Y. Lightweight automobile and application of aluminum alloys in modern automobile production [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2016, 41(2): 1-6.

[3]郭玉琴,朱新峰,杨艳,等. 汽车轻量化材料及制造工艺研究现状[J]. 锻压技术,2015, 40(3):1-6.

Guo Y Q, Zhu X F, Yang Y, et al. Research state of lightweight material and manufacture processes in automotive industry [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2015, 40(3): 1-6.

[4]Kwak D Y, Jeong J H, Cheon J S, et al. Optimal design of composite hood with reinforcing ribs through stiffness analysis [J]. Composite Structures, 1997, 38(1): 351-359.

[5]中国航空研究院. 复合材料连接手册[M].北京：航空工业出版社, 1994.

China Bureau of Aeronautical Research. Handbook of Composite Connections[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press,1994.

[6]Kweon J H, Jung J W, Kim T H, et al. Failure of carbon composite-to-aluminum joints with combined mechanical fastening and adhesive bonding [J]. Composite Structures, 2006, 75(1): 192-198.

[7]于海平, 张旭, 章茂云,等. 大直径铝合金铆钉以铆代螺可行性试验研究[J]. 航天制造技术, 2016, (4):1-4.

Yu H P, Zhang X, Zhang M Y, et al. Experimental investigation on feasibility of substituting large diameter riveting for bolting [J]. Aerospace Manufacturing Technology, 2016, (4):1-4.

[8]Zieve P B. Low Voltage Electromagnetic Riveter [D]. USA: University of Washington, 1986.

[9]Li G Y, Jiang H, Zhang X, et al. Mechanical properties and fatigue behavior of electromagnetic riveted lap joints influenced by shear loading [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2017, 26: 226-239.

[10]曹增强, 刘洪. 电磁铆接技术[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2007, 14(1): 120-123.

Cao Z Q, Liu H. Electromagnetic riveting technology [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2007, 14(1): 120-123.

[11]Proctor P. Electromagnetic riveting upgraded [J]. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 1996, 144(19): 51.

[12]GB/T 867—1986，半圆头铆钉[S].

GB/T 867—1986，Round head rivets [S].

[13]HB 6239—2002，半圆头铆钉[S].

HB 6239—2002，Round head rivets [S].

[14]QJ 782A—2005, 铆接通用技术要求[S].

QJ 782A—2005, General technical requirements for riverting[S].

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】