锻压技术

纯钛半球形零件拉深回弹影响因素分析

英文标题：Analysis on drawing springback influencing factors for pure titanium hemispherical part

单位：1. 沈阳航空航天大学材料科学与工程学院 2. 中国科学院金属研究所沈阳材料科学国家（联合）实验室

分类号：TG365

出版年,卷(期):页码：2018,43(12):57-61

摘要：

以0.6 mm厚TA0纯钛薄板为研究对象，建立了符合实际的半球形零件拉深及回弹有限元模型，对半球形纯钛薄壁件拉深回弹过程进行了数值模拟研究，分析了工艺参数对回弹量的影响规律，并进行了相关的试验验证。结果表明：回弹量随着摩擦系数的增加而减小，摩擦系数小于0.14时，回弹量减少趋势明显，大于0.14时回弹量减少趋势变缓；回弹量随着单位压边力增大而减小，单位压边力小于1.4 MPa时，回弹量变化显著,随着压边力的增大，回弹量减少趋势平缓；回弹量随凸凹模间隙的增大而增大。最后，在数值模拟的基础上进行了实际拉深试验，壁厚测试的实际结果与有限元模拟结果基本吻合，回弹后尺寸满足零件尺寸要求。

For TA0 pure titanium sheet with 0.6 mm thickness, the finite element models of actual hemispheric part deep drawing and springback were established, and their drawing springback processes were numerically simulated. Then, the related test verifications were conducted, and the influences of process parameters on springback amount were investigated. The results show that the springback amount reduces with the increasing of friction coefficient, and the springback amount decreases obviously when the friction coefficient is less than 0.14. However, when the friction coefficient is larger than 0.14, the springback amount decreases smoothly. Furthermore, the springback amount reduces with the increasing of unit blank holder force, and the springback amount changes significantly when the unit blank holder force is less than 1.4 MPa. With the increasing of blank holder force, the springback amount decreases smoothly, and the springback amount increases with the increasing of clearance between punch and die. Finally, the actual drawing test is conducted on the basis of numerical simulation, the results of wall thickness test are basically consistent with the finite element simulation results, and the dimension after springback meets the size requirements of parts.

基金项目：

基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51405310)；辽宁省自然科学基金资助项目（201602554）

作者简介：高恩志(1979-)，男，博士，讲师 Email：ezhgao@imr.ac.cn

参考文献：

参考文献:

［1］Zhang Z，Wu J，Zhang S，et al. A new iterative method for springback control based on theory analysis and displacement adjustment
［J］.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2016，105:330-339.

［2］Hama T， Sakai T， Fujisaki Y，et al.Timedependent springback of a commercially pure titanium sheet
［J］. Procedia Engineering，2017，207:263-268.

［3］吴欣,王飞,沈国强,等. 高强度钢短立边长行程直翻边成形过程材料回弹规律研究
［J］. 塑性工程学报,2016,23(4):29-35.

Wu X,Wang F,Shen G Q, et al. Experimental and numerical study on springback rules of shot flanging process for high strength steel
［J］. Journal of Plasticity Engineering,2016,23(4):29-35.

［4］高恩志，李宏伟，寇宏超. 等. 工艺参数对TA0半球件冷拉深成形的影响规律
［J］. 塑性工程学报，2009，16(3):59-63.

Gao E Z，Li H W，Kou H C，et al. Influence of processing parameters on the deep drawing of TA0 titanium hemispherical part
［J］. Journal of Plasticity Engineering，2009，16(3):59-63.

［5］Li K P， Geng L， Wagoner R H. Simulation of springback
［J］. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2002， 44 (1): 103-122.

［6］Song F F, Yang H, Li H，et al. Springback prediction of thickwalled highstrength titanium tube bending
［J］. Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Beihang University，2013，26(5): 1336-1345.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】