锻压技术

应变计式力传感器对高速拉伸载荷振荡的改善

英文标题：Improvement of load oscillation in highspeed tension by strain gauge force sensor

作者：郑韬俞宁峰连昌伟

分类号：TG142；O329

出版年,卷(期):页码：2019,44(8):124-128

摘要：

采用液压伺服试验机进行高速拉伸试验是获得材料动态力学特性最直接的实验手段，但在较高拉伸应变速率下，经常会产生载荷振荡问题。以宝钢牌号为B410LA与DP1180两种钢作为研究对象，采用试验机自带的压电式力传感器与改进的应变计式力传感器，在不同应变速率下进行单向拉伸试验。通过对比不同应变速率下的时间-载荷曲线，发现随着应变速率的增加，压电式力传感器的振荡幅度增加明显，应变速率达到500 s-1及以上，载荷振荡幅度达到30%~40%，影响载荷的测量精度；采用应变计式力传感器，在拉伸应变速率小于500 s-1的试验情况下，时间-载荷曲线上所显示得到的振荡的幅度控制在10%的范围内。

The highspeed tensile test using a hydraulic servo tester is the most direct experimental method to obtain the dynamic mechanical properties of material, but the load oscillation problem often occurs at higher tensile strain rates. For B410LA and DP1180 steels produced by Baosteel, the uniaxial tensile test was conducted at different strain rates by the orginal piezoelectric force sensor of test mechine and the improved strain gauge force sensor, and the timeload curves at different strain rates were compared. It is found that with the increasing of strain rate, the oscillation amplitude of the piezoelectric force sensor increases significantly, when the strain rate reaches 500 s-1 and above, the load oscillation amplitude reaches 30%~40%, and the measurement accuracy of load is affected. Furthermore, the oscillation amplitude shown on the time-load curve is controlled within 10% by the strain gauge force sensor in the case of the tensile strain rate less than 500 s-1.

基金项目：

作者简介：郑韬（1983-），男，本科，助理工程师 E-mail：13774293603@139.com

参考文献：

[1] 刘鹏鹏，叶又，魏一凡，等. 金属材料高应变速率拉伸试验的应用及现状[J]. 理化检验:物理分册, 2018, 45(9): 641-645.

Liu P P, Ye Y, Wei Y F, et al. Application and current status of high strain rate tensile test of metallic materials [J]. Physical and Chemical Testing：Physical Section, 2018, 45(9): 641-645.

[2] 白春玉，刘小川，周苏枫，等.中应变速率下材料动态拉伸关键参数测试方法[J]. 爆破与冲击，2015,35（4）：507-512.

Bai C Y, Liu X C, Zhou S F, et al. Test method for key parameters of dynamic tensile strength of materials under medium strain rate[J]. Blasting and Shock, 2015, 35(4): 507-512.

[3] Yang X, Hector L G, Wang J. A combined theoretical/experimental approach for reducing ringing artifacts in low dynamic testing with servohydraulic load frames[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2014, 54(5): 775-789.

[4] 连昌伟, 陈新平，俞宁峰,等. 高伸长率QP钢在高应变速率下的力学特性[J]. 锻压技术，2017，42（7）：163-168.

Lian C W, Chen X P, Yu N F, et al. Mechanical properties of high elongation QP steel at high strain rate[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2017, 42 (7): 163-168.

[5] GB/T 228.1—2010，金属材料拉伸试验第1部分：室温试验方法 [S].

GB/T 228.1—2010, Tensile test for metallic materialsPart 1: Test method for room temperature [S].

[6] ISO 26203—2—2011,Metallic materials—Tensile testing at high strain rates—Part 2: Servohydraulic and other test systems[S].

[7] ASTM E111—97, Standard test method for Yong′s modulus, Tangent modulus , and Chord modulus[S].

[8] 王学双，庄华晔，曹广祥.汽车用先进高强钢动态力学行为研究[J].汽车工艺与材料, 2015，(9):35-39.

Wang X S, Zhuang H Y, Cao G X. Research on dynamic mechanical behavior of advanced high strength steel for automobiles[J]. Automotive Technology and Materials, 2015，(9): 35-39.

[9] 苑文婧，刘晓航，田浩彬.应变速率对低合金高强钢力学性能的影响[J].上海第二工业大学学报，2013,30(1):43-47.

Yuan W Y, Liu X H, Tian H B. Effect of strain rate on mechanical properties of low alloy high strength steel [J]. Journal of Shanghai Second Polytechnic University, 2013, 30(1): 43-47.

[10]李和平，周星，徐惟诚，等.GB/T 228.1—2010中应力速率的三种理解及在宣贯和实施过程中出现的问题[J].理化检验:物理分册，2013,49(8):489-493.

Li H P, Zhou X, Xu W C, et al. Three understandings of stress rate in GB/T 228.1—2010 and problems in the process of publicity and implementation[J]. Physical and Chemical Testing (Physical Section), 2013, 49(8): 489-493.

[11]高怡斐.GB/T 228.1—2010中应变速率控制模式（方法Ａ）的解读[J].理化检验:物理分册，2013,49(8): 494-496.

Gao Y F. Interpretation of strain rate control mode (method A) in GB/T 228.1—2010[J]. Physical and Chemical Testing :Physical Section, 2013, 49(8): 494-496.

[12]李卫华，王承忠.基于拉伸变形本质行为的试验方法探讨[J].理化检验:物理分册，2018，54（4）：239-243.

Li W H, Wang C Z. Discussion on test methods based on the essential behavior of tensile deformation[J]. Physical and Chemical Testing:Physical Section, 2018, 54(4): 239-243.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】