锻压技术

响应曲面法优化钢铝异种材料自冲铆接工艺参数的研究

英文标题：Research on optimization of process parameters for self-piercing riveting of steel-aluminium dissimilar materials based on response surface method

作者：王端义

单位：江苏建筑职业技术学院北京理工大学

关键词：钢铝异种材料自冲铆接响应曲面法互锁长度铆接速度

分类号：TG386

出版年,卷(期):页码：2019,44(12):65-69

摘要：

以电动汽车上钢铝异种板材的自冲铆接作为分析对象，利用Deform-2D软件建立1.5 mm料厚的DC03钢板与1 mm料厚的6016-T4铝板的自冲铆接有限元模型。将模具深度、模具宽度及铆接速度作为影响因素，以互锁长度作为优化目标，运用响应曲面法对钢铝异种板材的自冲铆接工艺参数进行优化。研究得知：铆接速度与模具宽度对互锁长度的交互式影响最大，模具宽度与模具深度的交互式影响次之，铆接速度与模具深度的交互式影响最小。DC03/6016-T4异种板材自冲铆接的优化工艺参数组合方案为：铆接速度为40 mm·s-1，模具宽度为9.77 mm，模具深度为1.69 mm，互锁长度的响应值为0.616 mm。通过对优化后的铆接工艺参数的组合方案进行实际验证，测量得出互锁长度的试验值为0.547 mm，响应曲面优化值与试验值两者之间的相对误差为11.2%，从而为企业的实际生产提供参考。

For self-piercing riveting of steel-aluminium dissimilar sheets on electric vehicles, the finite element model of self-piercing riveting for DC03 steel plate with 1.5 mm thickness and 6016-T4 aluminum plate with 1 mm thickness was established by software Deform-2D. Then, the die depth, die width and riveting speed were taken as the influencing factors, and the interlocking length was taken as the optimization objective, the process parameters of self-piercing riveting for steel-aluminum dissimilar sheets were optimized by response surface method. The results show that the interaction between riveting speed and die width has the greatest impact on the interlocking length, followed by the interaction between die width and die depth, and the interaction between riveting speed and die depth is the smallest. Therefore, the optimized process parameters of self-piercing riveting for dissimilar sheets between DC03 steel and 6016-T4 aluminium are the riveting speed of 40 mm·s-1, the die width of 9.77 mm, the die depth of 1.69 mm and the response value of interlocking length of 0.616 mm. Furthermore, the experiment of the optimized process parameters combination scheme is conducted, and the experiment value of interlocking length is 0.547 mm by measurement. Thus, the relative error between the optimized value of response surface and the experimental value is 11.2% to provide a reference for the actual production of enterprises.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金资助项目(61801198)；2018年高等职业教育高水平骨干专业-机电一体化技术项目(90151222918005);江苏建筑职业技术学院2019科研项目

王端义（1976-），男，硕士，副教授 E-mail：519047033@qq.com

参考文献：

［1］张林阳. 全铝及钢-铝混合车身轻量化连接技术
［J］. 汽车工艺与材料, 2018, （7）: 1-8,14.

Zhang L Y. Lightweight connection technology for all-aluminum and steel-aluminum hybrid body
［J］. Automobile Technology & Material, 2018, （7）: 1-8,14.

［2］韩杰. 钢铝混合车身连接工艺的应用与发展
［J］. 汽车零部件, 2018, （7）: 53-56.

Han J. Application and development of joining process of aluminum-steel hybrid vehicle body
［J］. Automobile Parts, 2018, （7）: 53-56.

［3］庄蔚敏, 刘洋, 王鹏跃, 等. 钢铝异质自冲铆接头剥离失效
［J］.吉林大学学报:工学版, 2019, 49（6）: 1826-1835.

Zhuang W M, Liu Y, Wang P Y，et al. Peeling failure behavior of self-piercing riveted joints in steel and aluminum alloy dissimilar sheets
［J］. Journal of Jilin University：Engineering and Technology Edition, 2019, 49（6）: 1826-1835.

［4］余康, 邢保英, 何晓聪, 等. 钢/铝异种板自冲铆接头的腐蚀性能研究
［J］. 热加工工艺, 2018, 47（15）: 1-5.

Yu K, Xing B Y, He X C, et al. Study on corrosion properties of self-piercing riveted joints of steel/aluminum dissimilar sheet
［J］. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47（15）: 1-5.

［5］张先炼, 何晓聪, 程强. 钢铝合金组合板自冲铆接头的力学性能研究
［J］. 热加工工艺, 2016, 45（15）: 136-139.

Zhang X L, He X C, Cheng Q. Study on mechanical performance of self-piercing riveted joints of steel and aluminum alloy assemble sheets
［J］. Hot Working Technology, 2016, 45（15）: 136-139.

［6］金鑫, 李永兵, 楼铭, 等. 基于正交试验的铝合金—高强钢异种金属自冲铆接工艺优化
［J］. 汽车工程学报, 2011, 1 （3): 185-191.

Jin X, Li Y B, Lou M, et al. Process optimization of self-piercing riveting aluminum to high strength steel using DOE method
［J］. Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2011, 1 （3）: 185-191.

［7］黄志超, 黄秋雯, 李绍杰, 等. 异种金属材料自冲铆接头位置对疲劳强度的影响
［J］. 锻压技术, 2017, 42（9）: 150-156.

Huang Z C, Huang Q W, Li S J, et al. Influence of the self-piercing riveting position of dissimilar metal on fatigue strength
［J］. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2017, 42（9）: 150-156.

［8］樊文欣, 汤传尧, 潘何勇. 基于响应曲面法的错距旋压连杆衬套各旋轮工作圆弧半径的研究
［J］. 锻压技术, 2018, 43（8）: 85-89.

Fan W X, Tang C Y, Pan H Y. Study on working radius of rotating wheel during stagger spinning of rod bushing based on response surface methodology
［J］. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2018, 43（8）: 85-89.

［9］佘文韬, 樊文欣, 史永鹏, 等. 基于响应曲面法的连杆衬套表面粗糙度预测模型和优化
［J］. 塑性工程学报, 2017, 24（6）: 172-176.

She W T, Fan W X, Shi Y P, et al. Prediction model and optimization of surface roughness of connecting rod bushing based on response surface method
［J］. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2017, 24（6）: 172-176.

［10］王瑞瑞, 原霞, 杨锋, 等. 基于响应曲面法的连杆衬套温挤压工艺参数优化
［J］. 热加工工艺, 2018, 47（23）: 161-164.

Wang R R, Yuan X, Yang F, et al. Optimization of warm extrusion parameters for connecting rod bushing based on response surface method
［J］. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47（23）: 161-164.

［11］徐永新, 胡新颖, 董娜, 等. 基于响应曲面法的新型高频冲击碾压工艺参数优选
［J］. 工具技术, 2018, 52（12）: 110-113.

Xu Y X, Hu X Y, Dong N, et al. Shot peening process preparation research
［J］. Tool Engineering, 2018, 52 （12）: 110-113.

［12］徐卫国. 基于响应曲面法的波形弹簧片冲压工艺参数优化
［J］. 锻压技术, 2017,42（3）: 175-179.

Xu W G. Optimization on stamping parameters of wave spring sheet based on response surface method
［J］. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2017, 42（3）: 175-179.

［13］徐敏, 姜海林. 基于响应曲面法的QSTE460板料冲裁工艺参数优化
［J］. 锻压技术, 2017, 42（12）: 46-51.

Xu M, Jiang H L. Optimization on process parameters for blanking QSTE460 sheet metal based on response surface method
［J］. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2017, 42（12）: 46-51.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】