锻压技术

管材各向异性和拉压非对称性表征与建模研究进展

英文标题：Research progress on characterization and modeling of anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry for tube

作者：李恒张昭杨恒魏栋

单位：西北工业大学

分类号：TG386

出版年,卷(期):页码：2021,46(4):6-16

摘要：

由于管材在制备过程中经历了复杂的多道次热力复合加工过程，通常具有明显的各向异性和拉压非对称性等性能，极大地影响了管材的成形性能和服役性能。如何准确、全面地表征管材的各向异性和拉压非对称性特征，并建立相应的本构模型，是管材成形设计与制造的前提和基础。然而，由于管材具有曲面、薄壁等几何特征，测试并表征管材的各向异性和拉压非对称性难度较大，对其各向异性和拉压非对称性的表征建模一直以来是国内外管材成形制造领域的前沿热点和难点问题。基于此，系统地总结了国内外近年来对于管材各向异性和拉压非对称性的测试表征手段，评述了相关的本构建模方法，并对测试表征与本构建模方法进行了展望。

Because the tube undergoes a complex multi-pass thermal-mechanical composite processing process during the preparation process, it usually has obvious anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry, which greatly affects the formability and service performance of tube. Therefore, how to accurately and comprehensively characterize the anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry of tube and establish the corresponding constitutive model is the premise and foundation of tube forming design and manufacture. However, due to the geometrical features such as curved surface and thin wall of tube, it is difficult to measure and characterize the anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry of tube, and the characterization modeling of anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry for tube has always been a hot and difficult problem in the field of tube forming manufacturing in China and at abroad. Based on the above, the methods of measuring and characterizing anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry of tube in China and at abroad in recent years were summarized, the relevant modeling methods were reviewed, and the test characterization and the constitutive modeling methods were prospected.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51775441，51835011)

李恒（1977-），男，博士，教授 E-mail：li-heng@nwpu.edu.cn

参考文献：

［1］Banerjee D, Williams J C. Perspectives on titanium science and technology
［J］. Acta Materialia, 2013,61(3): 844-879.

［2］Yang H, Li H, Zhang Z, et al. Advances and trends on tube bending forming technologies
［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012,25(1): 1-12.

［3］江志强, 杨合, 詹梅, 等. 钛合金管材研制及其在航空领域应用的现状与前景
［J］. 塑性工程学报, 2009,16(4): 44-50.

Jiang Z Q，Yang H，Zhan M，et al. State-of-the-arts and prospectives of manufacturing and application of titanium alloy tube in aviation industry
［J］. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2009,16(4): 44-50.

［4］徐宝池, 杨晨, 樊黎霞, 等. 变形量对冷径向锻造身管力学性能各向异性的影响
［J］. 兵器装备工程学报, 2020,41(5): 81-85.

Xu B C, Yang C, Fan L X, et al. Influence of forging ratio on mechanical properties anisotropy of precision forged barrel
［J］. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2020,41(5): 81-85.

［5］吴国华, 肖寒, 周慧子, 等. 挤压态AZ31镁合金温热拉伸性能的各向异性
［J］. 中国有色金属学报, 2017,27(1): 57-63.

Wu G H, Xiao H, Zhou H Z, et al. Anisotropy of warm-temperature tensile properties of extruded AZ31 magnesium alloy
［J］. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2017,27(1): 57-63.

［6］林艳丽, 何祝斌, 初冠南, 等. 利用管状试样测试各向异性材料双向应力状态力学性能的新方法
［J］. 金属学报, 2017,53(9): 1101-1109.

Lin Y L, He Z B, Chu G N, et al. A new method for directly testing the mechanical properties of anisotropic materials in bi-axialstress state by tube bulging test
［J］. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2017,53(9): 1101-1109.

［7］Nazari Tiji S A, Park T, Asgharzadeh A, et al. Characterization of yield stress surface and strain-rate potential for tubular materials using multiaxial tube expansion test method
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020,133: 102838-102864.

［8］Zisis T, Giannakopoulos A E. Analysis of Knoop indentation strain hardening effects
［J］. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2011,48(22-23): 3217-3231.

［9］Li H, Zhang H Q, Yang H, et al. Anisotropic and asymmetrical yielding and its evolution in plastic deformation: Titanium tubular materials
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2017,90: 177-211.

［10］Dick C P, Korkolis Y P. Anisotropy of thin-walled tubes by a new method of combined tension and shear loading
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2015,71: 87-112.

［11］Dick C P, Korkolis Y P. Strength and ductility evaluation of cold-welded seams in aluminum tubes extruded through porthole dies
［J］. Materials & Design, 2015,67: 631-636.

［12］Dick C P, Korkolis Y P. Mechanics and full-field deformation study of the ring hoop tension test
［J］. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2014,51(18): 3042-3057.

［13］He Z, Yuan S, Liu G, et al. Formability testing of AZ31B magnesium alloy tube at elevated temperature
［J］. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2010,210(6-7): 877-884.

［14］Cui X L, Yuan S J. Determination of mechanical properties of anisotropic thin-walled tubes under three-dimensional stress state
［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016,87(5-8): 1917-1927.

［15］Kuwabara T, Sugawara F. Multiaxial tube expansion test method for measurement of sheet metal deformation behavior under biaxial tension for a large strain range
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2013,45: 103-118.

［16］Kuwabara T. Anisotropic plastic deformation of extruded aluminum alloy tube under axial forces and internal pressure
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2005,21(1): 101-117.

［17］Korkolis Y, Kyriakides S. Inflation and burst of anisotropic aluminum tubes for hydroforming applications
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2008,24(3): 509-543.

［18］Yoon J, Cazacu O, Mishra R K. Constitutive modeling of AZ31 sheet alloy with application to axial crushing
［J］. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013,565: 203-212.

［19］Hu Q, Li X, Han X, et al. A normalized stress invariant-based yield criterion: Modeling and validation
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2017,99: 248-273.

［20］Stoughton T B, Yoon J. A pressure-sensitive yield criterion under a non-associated flow rule for sheet metal forming
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2004,20(4-5): 705-731.

［21］Kuwabara T. Advances in experiments on metal sheets and tubes in support of constitutive modeling and forming simulations
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2007,23(3): 385-419.

［22］Yin Q, Soyarslan C, Isik K, et al. A grooved in-plane torsion test for the investigation of shear fracture in sheet materials
［J］. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2015,66: 121-132.

［23］Abedini A, Butcher C, Rahmaan T, et al. Evaluation and calibration of anisotropic yield criteria in shear loading: Constraints to eliminate numerical artefacts
［J］. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018,151: 118-134.

［24］Ghaffari Tari D, Worswick M J, Ali U, et al. Mechanical response of AZ31B magnesium alloy: Experimental characterization and material modeling considering proportional loading at room temperature
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2014,55: 247-267.

［25］Martínez A, Miguel V, Coello J, et al. Determining stress distribution by tension and by compression applied to steel: Special analysis for TRIP steel sheets
［J］. Materials & Design, 2017,125: 11-25.

［26］Bennett C J, Leen S B, Williams E J, et al. A critical analysis of plastic flow behaviour in axisymmetric isothermal and Gleeble compression testing
［J］. Computational Materials Science, 2010,50(1): 125-137.

［27］Cao J, Lee W, Cheng H S, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of combined isotropic-kinematic hardening behavior of sheet metals
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2009,25(5): 942-972.

［28］Kitamura K, Terano M. Determination of local properties of plastic anisotropy in thick plate by small-cube compression test for precise simulation of plate forging
［J］. CIRP Annals, 2014,63(1): 293-296.

［29］Ul Hassan H, Maqbool F, Güner A, et al. Springback prediction and reduction in deep drawing under influence of unloading modulus degradation
［J］. International Journal of Material Forming, 2016,9(5): 619-633.

［30］Yang H, Li H, Ma J, et al. Temperature dependent evolution of anisotropy and asymmetry of α-Ti in thermomechanical working: Characterization and modeling
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020,127: 102650-102690.

［31］Kabirian F, Khan A S, Gnupel-Herlod T. Visco-plastic modeling of mechanical responses and texture evolution in extruded AZ31 magnesium alloy for various loading conditions
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2015,68: 1-20.

［32］Patra A, Zhu T, Mcdowell D L. Constitutive equations for modeling non-Schmid effects in single crystal BCC-Fe at low and ambient temperatures
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2014,59: 1-14.

［33］Tuninetti V, Gilles G, Milis O, et al. Anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry modeling of the room temperature plastic response of Ti-6Al-4V
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2015,67: 53-68.

［34］Gawad J, Banabic D, Van Bael A, et al. An evolving plane stress yield criterion based on crystal plasticity virtual experiments
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2015,75: 141-169.

［35］张飞飞, 陈劼实, 陈军, 等. 各向异性屈服准则的发展及实验验证综述
［J］. 力学进展, 2012,42(1): 68-80.

Zhang F F，Chen J S，Chen J，et al. Review on development and experimental validation for anisotropic yield criterions
［J］. Advances in Mechanics, 2012,42(1): 68-80.

［36］Barlat F, Brem J C, Yoon J W, et al. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—Part 1: Theory
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2003,19(9): 1297-1319.

［37］Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon J W, et al. Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2005,21(5): 1009-1039.

［38］Cazacu O, Plunkett B, Barlat F. Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2006,22(7): 1171-1194.

［39］Yoon J W, Lou Y, Yoon J, et al. Asymmetric yield function based on the stress invariants for pressure sensitive metals
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2014,56: 184-202.

［40］Li H, Hu X, Yang H, et al. Anisotropic and asymmetrical yielding and its distorted evolution: Modeling and applications
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2016,82: 127-158.

［41］Zhang K, He Z, Zheng K, et al. Experimental verification of anisotropic constitutive models under tension-tension and tension-compression stress states
［J］. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020,178: 105618-105632.

［42］Wang X, Hu W, Huang S, et al. Experimental investigations on extruded 6063 aluminium alloy tubes under complex tension-compression stress states
［J］. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2019,168: 123-137.

［43］Khalfallah A, Oliveira M C, Alves J L, et al. Mechanical characterization and constitutive parameter identification of anisotropic tubular materials for hydroforming applications
［J］. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2015,104: 91-103.

［44］Hu W L. An orthotropic yield criterion in a 3-D general stress state
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2005,21(9): 1771-1796.

［45］Nixon M E, Cazacu O, Lebensohn R A. Anisotropic response of high-purity α-titanium: Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2010,26(4): 516-532.

［46］Plunkett B, Lebensohn R A, Cazacu O, et al. Anisotropic yield function of hexagonal materials taking into account texture development and anisotropic hardening
［J］. Acta Materialia, 2006,54(16): 4159-4169.

［47］Baral M, Hama T, Knudsen E, et al. Plastic deformation of commercially-pure titanium: experiments and modeling
［J］. International Journal of Plasticity, 2018,105: 164-194.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】