锻压技术

基于响应面法的汽车后轮罩工艺参数优化

英文标题：Optimization on process parameters for automobile rear wheel cover based on response surface method

作者：魏鑫1 王雷刚1 王钊1 潘书华2

分类号：TG386.3

出版年,卷(期):页码：2021,46(10):70-77

摘要：

以某汽车后轮罩作为研究对象，采用响应面法对冲压工艺参数进行优化。选取压边力、拉延筋阻力系数、摩擦因数、凸凹模间隙为工艺参数变量，优化目标为拉延工序最大减薄率和修边工序后最大回弹量。采用Box-Behnken法设计响应曲面试验，建立工艺参数与拉延工序最大减薄率和修边工序后最大回弹量之间的响应面模型；通过响应面模型优化得到的压边力为350 kN、拉延筋阻力系数为0.40、摩擦因数为0.13、凸凹模间隙为0.6 mm。采用经过优化的参数组合模拟得到的拉延工序最大减薄率和修边工序后最大回弹量的误差分别为0.5%和0.2%，可用于替代有限元模型进行计算。根据最优工艺参数组合指导模面回弹补偿并进行试生产，可以生产出满足质量要求的汽车后轮罩。

For the automobile rear wheel cover, the stamping process parameters were optimized by the response surface method. Then, the blank holder force, resistance coefficient of drawbead, friction factor and clearance between punch and die were selected as the process parameter variables, and the optimization goals are the maximum thinning rate in the drawing process and the maximum springback amount after the trimming process. Furthermore, the response surface test was designed by Box-Behnken method, and the response surface model between the process parameters and the maximum thinning rate in the drawing process and the maximum springback amount after the trimming process was established. Through the optimization of the response surface model, the blank holder force was 350 kN, the resistance coefficient of drawbead was 0.40, the friction factor was 0.13, and the clearance between punch and die was 0.6 mm. And the errores of the maximum thinning rate in the drawing process and the maximum springback amount after the trimming process was 0.5% and 0.2% respectively, which were obtained by the optimized parameters combination simulation, which can replace the finite element model to calculate. According to the optimal process parameters combination, the die surface springback compensation was guided and the trial production was conducted, which could produce the automobile rear wheel cover meeting the quality requirements.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金资助项目（51775249）

作者简介：魏鑫（1996-），男，硕士研究生 E-mail：451099074@qq.com 通信作者：王雷刚（1963-），男，博士，教授 E-mail：lgwang@ujs.edu.cn

参考文献：

[1]杨小玲. 车身覆盖件成形数值模拟及工艺参数优化[D].南昌:南昌大学,2011.

Yang X L. Numerical Simulation of Car Body Panel Forming and Optimization of Process Parameters [D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2011.

[2]王钊,魏鑫,王雷刚,等.基于响应面的汽车中立柱内板影响因素多目标优化[J].锻压技术,2020,45(7):46-50.

Wang Z, Wei X, Wang L G, et al. Multi-objective optimization on influencing factors for central pillar inner panel of automobile based on response surface[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020,45(7):46-50.

[3]万志远,陈银平.某轿车C柱内板冲压分析与成形模设计 [J].锻压技术,2020,45(1):69-72.

Wan Z Y, Chen Y P. Stamping analysis and forming die design of the C-pillar inner plate of a certain car [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020, 45(1):69-72.

[4]刘丽娟.基于稳健冲压工艺的门内板回弹补偿[J].锻压技术,2019,44(1):53-60.

Liu L J. Springback compensation of inner door panel based on robust stamping process[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2019,44(1):53-60.

[5]李奇涵,景淑帆,高嵩,等.基于响应面法的22MnB5高强钢热冲压成形性优化[J].锻压技术,2020,45(6):93-101.

Li Q H, Jing S F, Gao S, et al. Optimization of hot stamping formability of 22MnB5 high strength steel based on response surface method[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020, 45(6):93-101.

[6]田国富,李文杰,李君基.基于Dynaform的6016-T4P铝合金汽车机舱盖模面优化[J].锻压技术, 2020, 45(1):61-68.

Tian G F, Li W J, Li J J. Optimization on die surface of engine compartment for 6016-T4P aluminum alloy based on Dynaform [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020, 45(1):61-68.

[7]尤彬波,杨建,谢国文,等.前车门外板工艺分析及工序数量优化方法[J].锻压技术,2019,44(11):75-80.

You B B, Yang J, Xie G W, et al. Process analysis and optimization method of operation quantity for automobile front door outer panel [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2019, 44(11):75-80.

[8]Oujebbour F Z, Habbal A, Ellaia R. Optimization of stamping process parameters to predict and reduce springback and failure criterion[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(2):495-514.

[9]张勇,范轶,薛洋.基于Dynaform和正交试验的轿车加强梁冲压工艺参数优化[J].锻压技术,2019,44(2):37-42.

Zhang Y, Fan Y, Xue Y. Optimization on stamping process parameters of car reinforced beam based on Dynaform and orthogonal test[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2019, 44(2):37-42.

[10] 何为, 唐斌, 薛卫东. 优化试验设计方法及数据分析[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2012.

He W, Tang B, Xue W D. Optimizing Experimental Design Methods and Data Analysis[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2012.

[11] 沈云飞. 基于改进响应面法的高强钢板冲压工艺参数稳健性优化[D].长沙:湖南大学,2018.

Shen Y F. Robust Optimization of High-strength Steel Sheet Stamping Process Parameters Based on Improved Response Surface Method[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2018.

[12] 伍建军,王子宁,任崇轩,等.基于响应面法的升降机滚筒线支架轻量化设计[J].机械设计与制造,2020，(8):263-266.

Wu J J, Wang Z N, Ren C X, et al. Lightweight design of elevator drum line support based on response surface method[J]. Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, 2020, (8):263-266.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】