锻压技术

基于正交实验的弯链板U弯冲压成形数值仿真基于正交实验的弯链板U弯冲压成形数值仿真

英文标题：Numerical simulation on U-bending for curved chain plate based on orthogonal experiment

作者：汪永明李偎谈莉斌胡继涛董书豪

分类号：TH162

出版年,卷(期):页码：2021,46(12):46-53

摘要：

为分析凹模圆角半径、凹凸模单边间隙和凸模补偿回弹角对弯链板U弯冲压成形的影响，设计了3因素4水平的正交实验，利用Workbench对16组实验进行U弯冲压成形数值仿真，并计算仿真成形工件的尺寸偏差比。以冲压仿真成形模型尺寸与工艺尺寸的误差最小为目标，利用综合加权评分法进行整体极差分析与方差分析，得到模具的最优工艺参数。结果表明：当凹模圆角半径为8 mm、凹凸模单边间隙为4.35 mm、凸模补偿回弹角为0.05°时，弯链板的U弯冲压成形效果最好，为模具的最优工艺设计参数。通过模具样机实验验证，U弯冲压成形后工件的合格率在97.7%以上，基本达到了预期的工艺设计要求。

In order to analyze the influence of die fillet radius, unilateral clearance between die and punch and compensation springback angle of punch on U-bending of curved chain plate, an orthogonal experiment with three factors and four levels was designed, and sixteen groups of experiments were simulated numerically by Workbench to calculate the dimensional deviation ratio of the simulated forming workpiece. Then, with the goal of minimizing the error between the dimensions of the stamping simulation forming model and the process dimensions, the overall range analysis and the variance analysis were performed by the comprehensive weighted scoring method to obtain the optimal process parameters of mold. The results show that when the die fillet radius is 8 mm, the unilateral clearance between die and punch is 4.35 mm, and the compensation springback angle of punch is 0.05°, the U-bending effect of the curved chain plate is the best, which is the optimal process design parameters of mold. Through the experimental verification of mold prototype, the pass rate of workpiece after U-bending is over 97.7%, which basically meets the expected process design requirements.

基金项目：

安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(202004a05020008)

汪永明（1971-）,男，博士,教授 E-mail：wangym@ahut.edu.cn

参考文献：

[1]Ai S, Lu B, Chen J，et al. Evaluation of deformation stability and fracture mechanism in incremental sheet forming[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2017，124-125（5）:174-184.

[2]Yanamundra K K, Karthikeyan R, Naranje V. Finite element simulation and Experimental verification of Incremental Sheet metal Forming [J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 346（1）:1-12.

[3]窦晓霜. 中央通道超高强钢热成形工艺参数及回弹控制研究[D]. 长沙：湖南大学，2018.

Dou X S. Research on Hot Forming Process Parameters and Springback Control of Central Channel Ultrahigh Strength Steel[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2018.

[4]李栓柱. 板管式板片冲压成形的数值模拟及分析[J]. 制造业自动化，2019，41(6)：27-29.

Li S Z. Numerical simulation and analysis of plate tube sheet stamping forming[J]. Manufacturing Automation, 2019，41(6):27-29, 53.

[5]Dhinesh K S, Subhasankari T, Paneerselvam T，et al. Simulation and numerical analysis of warm stamping (AA6061) [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings，2019，16（2）: 598-603.

[6]Kumar S, Hariharan K, Digavalli R. Hybrid optimization of die design in constrained groove pressing[J]. Materials and Manufacturing Processes: Special Issue on Genetic Algorithm， 2020，35(6): 687-699.

[7]Moghadam M, Nielsen C V, Bay N. Analysis of the risk of galling in sheet metal stamping dies with drawbeads[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture， 2020，234(9): 1207-1214.

[8]Ma W, Wang B, Xiao W，et al. Springback analysis of 6016 aluminum alloy sheet in hot Vshape stamping[J]. Journal of Central South University， 2019，26(3): 524-535.

[9]Chen J, Xu D, Xia G，et al. Geometric compensation for automotive stamping die design integrating structure deflection and blank thinning[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2013，66(9-12): 1449-1456.

[10]王琳，王明强. 基于数值仿真的台阶型定位销冷镦成形工艺优化[J]. 锻压技术，2019，44(7)：96-100.

Wang L, Wang M Q. Optimization on cold upsetting process for step positioning pin based on numerical simulation[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2019，44(7):96-100.

[11]黄海峰，刘晋，吴志，等. 工业纯钛TA1板冷变形过程分析及回弹研究[J]. 热加工工艺，2020，49(9)：81-84.

Wang H F, Liu J, Wu Z，et al. Cold deformation process analysis and springback study of industrial pure titanium TA1 plate[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2020，49(9):81-84.

[12]蔡厚道，陈云. 基于回归正交设计与综合加权评分法的注塑成形工艺优化[J]. 塑料工业，2018，46(9)：67-71.

Cai H D, Chen Y. Optimization of injection molding process based on orthogonal regression design and synthetic weighted mark method[J]. China Plastics Industry, 2018,46(9):67-71.

[13]董娇. 基于稳健设计与综合加权评分法的注塑工艺参数优化[J]. 中国塑料，2017，31(9)：108-113.

Dong J. Optimization of parameters of injection molding process based on taguchi and synthetic weighted mark methods[J]. China Plastics, 2017，31(9):108-113.

[14]姜天亮，龚红英，钱勇，等. 基于响应面法的U形件弯曲成形回弹优化[J]. 锻压技术，2020，45(1)：63-68.

Jiang T L, Gong H Y, Qian Y，et al. Optimization on bending springback of Ushaped parts based on response surface method[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020，45(1): 63-68.

[15]谢延敏，张飞，王子豪，等. 基于渐变凹模圆角半径的高强钢扭曲回弹补偿[J]. 机械工程学报，2019，55(2)：91-97.

Xei Y M, Zhang F, Wang Z H，et al. Compensation of twist springback in highstrength steel based on gradient die radius[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019，55(2): 91-97.

[16]吕琳，公冶凡娇，邓雨辰，等. 凸台板件挤压成形中的几个问题[J]. 热加工工艺，2019，48(11)：95-99.

Lyu L, Gongye F J, Deng Y C，et al. Several problems in extrusion forming of sheet metal with boss[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2019，48(11): 95-99.

服务与反馈：

【本网站尚未开通全文下载服务】【加入收藏】