网站首页期刊简介编委会过刊目录投稿指南广告合作征订与发行联系我们English
基于曲率差的回弹评价方法及其应用
英文标题:Springback evaluation method based on curvature difference and its application
作者:张赛军1 宋世光1 王一帆1 刘进军2 
单位:1. 华南理工大学 机械与汽车工程学院 2. 祥鑫科技股份有限公司 技术中心 
关键词:板材成形 回弹评价 点云 曲率差 修模 
分类号:TG386
出版年,卷(期):页码:2022,47(4):78-83
摘要:

 针对板料在常温下冲压成形时回弹较大,且现有的评价方法无法判断回弹发生的具体位置而难以准确指导修模的问题,提出一种基于曲率差的回弹评价方法来表征冲压零件回弹,可以准确地显示零件回弹发生的具体位置。首先,采用GOM ATOS Core光学三维扫描仪获取冲压件回弹后的型面,以凸模型面作为冲压件回弹前的型面,再通过MeshLab软件将连续曲面离散为点云。然后,通过多层次B样条插值算法(MBA)将离散的点云拟合成曲面,计算每一点的平均曲率,并以回弹前后的曲率差值来表征回弹大小。最后,将该方法用于某汽车铝合金制成的前风窗下横梁和前防撞梁冲压件的整形阶段,根据冲压件回弹前后的曲率差修正模具型面,并采用位移法对比模具修正前后的零件回弹量。结果表明:前风窗下横梁的正负最大位移分别从+1.415和-2.508 mm减小为+0.707和-1.263 mm;前防撞梁的最大负位移从-3.574 mm减小为-0.801 mm,回弹量明显减小,满足其尺寸偏差要求。说明基于曲率差的回弹评价方法,可以准确地找到回弹发生的部位,并有效地指导回弹补偿工作。

 The springback of sheet metal is larger during the stamping process at room temperature, the existing evaluation methods cannot determine the specific location of the springback, and it is difficult to accurately guide the die modification. Therefore, in order to solve the above problems, a springback evaluation method based on curvature difference was proposed to characterize the springback of stamping parts, which accurately displayed the specific location of the springback for the part. First, the profile of stamping part after springback was obtained by optical three-dimensional scanner GOM ATOS Core, the punch profile was used as the profile of stamping part before springback, and the continuous surface was discretized into the point cloud by software MeshLab. Then, the discrete point cloud was fitted into a surface by a multi-level B-spline interpolation algorithm (MBA) to calculate the average curvature of each point, and the springback value was characterized by the curvature difference before and after springback. Finally, the method was used in the shaping stage of stamping parts for front windshield lower beam and front anti-collision beam made of aluminum alloy for an automobile, the die profile was corrected according to the curvature difference of stamping part before and after springback, and the springback amount of the part before and after die modification was compared by the displacement method. The results show that the maximum positive and negative displacements of the front windshield lower beam are reduced from +1.415 and -2.408 mm to +0.707 and -1.263 mm, respectively, and the maximum negative displacement of the front anti-collision beam is reduced from -3.574 mm to -0.801 mm, which significantly reduces the springback amount and meets the requirements of its size deviation. Thus, the springback evaluation method based on curvature difference can accurately find the location of the springback and effectively guide the springback compensation work.

基金项目:
广东省重点领域研发计划项目(2020B010184002)
作者简介:
作者简介:张赛军(1978-),男,工学博士,副教授 E-mail:mesjzhang@scut.edu.cn 通信作者:刘进军(1974-),男,工学学士,工程师 E-mail:c20@luckyxiangxin.com
参考文献:

 [1]刘勇, 耿会程,朱彬,等.高强铝合金高效热冲压工艺研究进展[J].锻压技术,2020,45(7):1-12.


Liu Y, Geng H C, Zhu B, et al. Research progress of high-strength aluminum alloys with high-efficiency hot stamping process[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020, 45(7):1-12.

[2]谢晖, 唐长民,程威,等.多弯角零件冲压回弹控制方法的研究[J].塑性工程学报,2018,25(1):22-27.

Xie H, Tang C M, Cheng W, et al. Research on the control method of stamping springback of multi-bend parts[J]. Chinese Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2018, 25(1):22-27.

[3]Karafillis A P, Boyce M C. Tooling and binder design for sheet metal forming processes compensating springback error[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 1996, 36(4):503-526.

[4]Lee H S, Kim J H, Kang G S, et al. Development of seat side frame by sheet forming of DP980 with die compensation[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering & Manufacturing, 2017, 18(1):115-120.


[5]Wang Z Z, Hu Q, Yan J W, et al. Springback prediction and compensation for the third generation of UHSS stamping based on a new kinematic hardening model and inertia relief approach[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 90(1):875-885.


[6]李贵, 崔赛赛,陈志平,等.先进高强钢DP1000地板中央通道的成形回弹及补偿研究[J].材料科学与工艺,2018,26(2):15-20.

Li G, Cui S S, Chen Z P, et al. Research on forming springback and compensation of central channel of advanced high-strength steel DP1000 floor[J].Materials Science and Technology, 2018, 26(2):15-20.

[7]Gan W, Wagoner R H. Die design method for sheet springback[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2004, 46(7):1097-1113.

[8]Li G, Liu Y Q, Du T, et al. Algorithm research and system development on geometrical springback compensation system for advanced high-strength steel parts[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 70(1-4):413-427.

[9]姜天亮, 龚红英,钱勇,等. 基于响应面法的U形件弯曲成形回弹优化[J]. 锻压技术,2020,45(1):63-68.

Jiang T L,Gong H Y,Qian Y,et al. Optimization on bending springback of U-shaped parts based on response surface method [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology,2020,45(1):63-68.

[10]王辉, 周杰,熊煜,等.基于逆向工程的复杂曲面冲压件回弹补偿[J].吉林大学学报:工学版,2017, 47(6):1842-1847.

Wang H, Zhou J, Xiong Y, et al. Springback compensation of stamping parts with complex curved surfaces based on reverse engineering[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 2017, 47(6):1842-1847.

[11]张辉, 赵朕,潘爱琼.基于蓝光扫描逆向工程的某汽车A柱加强板冲压成形回弹补偿[J].锻压技术, 2020,45(9):75-80.

Zhang H, Zhao Z, Pan A Q. Reverse engineering of a certain automobile A-pillar reinforcement plate based on blue light scanning springback compensation[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020, 45(9): 75-80.

[12]朱东波, 马雷,李涤尘,等.复杂形状板料冲压件回弹评价指标研究[J].机械科学与技术,2000,19(6): 97-99.

Zhu D B, Ma L, Li D C, et al. Research on the springback evaluation index of complicated shape sheet metal stamping[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology, 2000, 19(6):97-99.

[13]Zhang D J, Cui Z S, Ruan X Y, et al. Sheet springback prediction based on non-linear combined hardening rule and Barlat89′s yielding function[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2006, 38(2): 256-262.

[14]孙伟, 王岩松,赵礼辉,等.基于响应面法的DP600高强钢U型件冲压拉延回弹变形研究[J].热加工工艺,2018,47(23):115-120.

Sun W, Wang Y S, Zhao L H, et al. Study on the springback deformation of DP600 high-strength steel U-shaped parts based on the response surface method[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47(23):115-120.

[15]周驰, 朱寅,廖娟.金属板材冲压回弹的测量及曲率评价[A]. 第三届全国地方机械工程学会学术年会暨海峡两岸机械科技论坛论文集[C]. 海南:海南省机械工程学会,2013.

Zhou C, Zhu Y, Liao J. Measurement and curvature evaluation of sheet metal stamping springback[A]. The Third National Academic Annual Conference of Local Mechanical Engineering Society and Strait Proceedings of Cross-Strait Mechanical Technology Forum[C]. Hainan: Hainan Mechanical Engineering Society, 2013.

[16]王一帆. 汽车某铝合金结构件冲压成形回弹预测及评价研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2020.

Wang Y F. Research on Springback Prediction and Evaluation of Stamping Forming of an Automotive Aluminum Alloy Structure[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020.

[17]Lee S, Wolberg G, Shin S Y. Scattered data interpolation with multilevel B-splines[J]. IEEE Trans. vis. Comput. Graphics, 1997, 3(3):228-244.

[18]张寅飞, 安鲁陵,神会存.散乱测量数据多层次B样条逼近曲面拟合算法[J].机械制造与自动化,2005,34(2):14-16.

Zhang Y F, An L L, Shen H C. Multi-level B-spline approximation surface fitting algorithm for scattered measurement data[J]. Machinery Manufacturing and Automation, 2005, 34(2):14-16.


 

 

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
《锻压技术》编辑部版权所有

中国机械工业联合会主管  中国机械总院集团北京机电研究所有限公司 中国机械工程学会主办
联系地址:北京市海淀区学清路18号 邮编:100083
电话:+86-010-82415085 传真:+86-010-62920652
E-mail: fst@263.net(稿件) dyjsjournal@163.com(广告)
京ICP备07007000号-9