网站首页期刊简介编委会过刊目录投稿指南广告合作征订与发行联系我们English
考虑单向拉伸预应变的DP780高强钢成形极限
英文标题:Forming limit on high strength steel DP780 considering uniaxial tensile pre-strain
作者:蔡达1 欧航1 蒋浩1 丁小娜1 李光耀1 2 崔俊佳1 
单位:1. 湖南大学 整车先进设计制造技术全国重点实验室 2. 北京理工大学 深圳汽车研究院(电动车辆国家工程实验室深圳研究院) 
关键词:高强钢 单向拉伸 预应变 力学性能 成形极限 
分类号:TG306
出版年,卷(期):页码:2024,49(7):90-96
摘要:

 为了建立双相钢DP780单向拉伸预应变条件下的成形极限曲线。对厚度为1.6 mm的DP780高强钢进行考虑单向拉伸预应变的力学性能测试。首先,在大试样上制造不同程度的单向拉伸预应变,随后在预变形后的大试样中心截取小试样进行单向拉伸测试并获取各向异性系数、断后伸长率和硬化系数等材料参数,从而基于半经验公式推导得到单向拉伸预应变条件下的成形极限曲线。单向拉伸预应变对材料性能参数和成形极限有显著影响。随着预应变程度的提升,断后伸长率逐步下降,当预应变达到12%时,断后伸长率下降幅度为35.4%。随着预应变的提升,平面应变到等双拉一侧区域内,成形极限点逐渐减小;单向拉伸一侧的成形极限曲线受预应变的影响向右偏移,但不随预应变的增加而改变。基于两步变形的物理实验和预测模型,能够高效地分析材料受特定预应变载荷下的力学性能,并建立准确反映预应变效应的成形极限图,便于工程技术人员在实际生产中对预应变板材的成形性能进行判断。

 In order to establish the forming limit curve of dual phase steel DP780 under uniaxial tensile pre-strain condition, the mechanical properties of high-strength steel DP780 with a thickness of 1.6 mm were tested considering uniaxial tensile pre-strain. Firstly, different degrees of uniaxial tensile pre-strain were manufactured on the large sample, and then, a small sample was intercepted at the center of pre-deformed large sample for uniaxial tensile test and the material parameters such as anisotropy coefficient, elongation after fracture and hardening coefficient were obtained. Furthermore, based on semi empirical formulas, the forming limit curve considering uniaxial tensile pre-strain was derived. The results show that the uniaxial tensile pre-strain has a significant impact on material performance parameters and forming limits. As the pre-strain increases, the elongation after fracture gradually decreases. When the pre-strain reaches 12%, the elongation after fracture decreases 35.4%. As the pre-strain increases, the forming limit point gradually decreases in the regions of plane strain and biaxial tensile strain. The forming limit curve on one side of uniaxial tension is shifted to the right due to the influence of pre-strain, but the forming limit does not change with the increasing of pre-strain. Based on two-step deformation physical experiments and prediction model, the mechanical properties of materials under specific pre-strain loads can be analyzed very efficiently, and an accurate forming limit diagram reflecting the pre-strain effect can be established, which is convenient for engineering  technologist to judge the forming performance of pre-strain plates in actual production.

基金项目:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52375331);深圳市科技计划项目(KQTD20200820113110016)
作者简介:
作者简介:蔡达(1994-),男,博士,助理研究员 E-mail:caida@hnu.ecu.cn 通信作者:崔俊佳(1983-),男,博士,教授 E-mail:cuijunjia@hnu.ecu.cn
参考文献:

 
[1]郭鹤, 张玉华. 基于MMC准则的双相高强钢HC820/1180DPD+Z断裂失效模型分析
[J]. 锻压技术, 2023, 48(10):235-244.


Guo H, Zhang Y H. Analysis on fracture failure model for dual-phase high-strength steel HC820/1180DPD+Z based on MMC criterion
[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2023, 48(10):235-244.


[2]余立, 刘静, 葛锐, 等.DP780双相钢在不同应变状态下的断裂特性及机理
[J]. 锻压技术, 2022, 47(10):48-55.

Yu L, Liu J, Ge R, et al. Fracture characteristics and mechanism on DP780 dual-phase steel under different strain states
[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2022, 47(10):48-55.


[3]Abspoel M, Scholting M E, Droog J M M. A new method for predicting forming limit curves from mechanical properties
[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2013, 213(5):759-769.


[4]何霁. 复杂加载下成形极限的理论预测研究
[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2014.

He J. Research on Prediction Methods of Forming Limits Under Complex Loading
[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014.


[5]Volk W, Hoffmann H, Suh J, et al. Failure prediction for nonlinear strain paths in sheet metal forming
[J]. CIRP Annals, 2012, 61(1): 259-62.


[6]Nurcheshmeh M, Green D E. Prediction of forming limit curves for nonlinear loading paths using quadratic and non-quadratic yield criteria and variable imperfection factor
[J]. Materials & Design, 2016, 91: 248-255.


[7]Basak S, Panda S K. Implementation of Yld96 anisotropy plasticity theory for estimation of polar effective plastic strain based failure limit of pre-strained thin steels
[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 126: 26-37.


[8]Zhu X, Chappuis L, Xia Z C, et al. A path-independent forming limit criterion for stamping simulations
[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2005, 778: 459.


[9]Drotleff K, Liewald M. Novel approach for prediction of localized necking in case of nonlinear strain paths
[J]. Journal of Physics Conference, 2017, 896(1): 012113.


[10]Drotleff K, Liewald M. Application of an advanced necking criterion for nonlinear strain paths to a complex sheet metal forming component
[J]. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 418(1): 012041.


[11]GB/T 228.1—2021,金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法
[S].

GB/T 228.1—2021,Metallic materials—Tensile testing—Part 1: Method of test at room temperature
[S].


[12]郭卫民,刘成宝,李永德,等.热轧碳素钢板断后伸长率与试样尺寸的关系
[J].机械工程材料, 2014, 38(2):11-14, 101.

Guo W M, Liu C B, Li Y D, et al. Relationship between percentage elongation after fracture and specimen size of hot rolled carbon steel plate
[J]. Material for Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38(2):11-14, 101.
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
《锻压技术》编辑部版权所有

中国机械工业联合会主管  中国机械总院集团北京机电研究所有限公司 中国机械工程学会主办
联系地址:北京市海淀区学清路18号 邮编:100083
电话:+86-010-82415085 传真:+86-010-62920652
E-mail: fst@263.net(稿件) dyjsjournal@163.com(广告)
京ICP备07007000号-9