Home
Editorial Committee
Brief Instruction
Back Issues
Instruction to Authors
Submission on line
Contact Us
Chinese

  The journal resolutely  resists all academic misconduct, once found, the paper will be withdrawn immediately.

Title:Review on deformation behavior of sheet metal during biaxial compression
Authors:  
Unit:  
KeyWords:  
ClassificationCode:TG113
year,vol(issue):pagenumber:2024,49(7):19-29
Abstract:

 The metal plastic forming process is typically subjected to multi-directional loading, whereas the uniaxial experiment can only reflect the mechanical response in one direction, and it is unable to characterize the deformation behavior of metal under multi-directional loading. In order to accurately describe the metal forming process, it is necessary to extend the research on the mechanical properties of sheet from uniaxial to biaxial or even multi-axial. In the actual forming process, such as stretching, forging and extrusion, the metal usually deforms under complex biaxial compressive stress. However, the influence of biaxial compressive stress state on the plastic deformation mechanism of metal is still unclear. Therefore, the mechanical response and corresponding microstructure evolution process of magnesium and aluminium alloys under biaxial compression loads were reviewed. First of all, the fixture and loading path used in the compression process were introduced. Subsequently, the selection of HCP metal twin types and variants during biaxial deformation was analyzed. The results demonstrate that the accumulation of macroscopic stress and strain facilitates the formation of twins during compression and secondary compression, and the secondary twin is correlated with the actual yield stress value of material. Finally, the commonly used constitutive models under biaxial compression were summarized, and the prospective development trends were discussed.

Funds:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51771166);河北省自然科学基金资助项目(E2019203452);材料成形与模具技术全国重点实验室开放课题(P2023-004)
AuthorIntro:
作者简介:石宝东(1982-),男,博士,教授 E-mail:baodong.shi@ysu.edu.cn
Reference:

 
[1]Hu Jack, Zdzislaw Marciniak, John Duncan, et al. Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming
[M]. Oxford:Elsevier, 2002.



[2]Zhang C, Wu D, He Y, et al. Twinning behavior, microstructure evolution and mechanical property of random-orientated ZK60 Mg alloy compressed at room temperature
[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(3): 1163.


[3]Zhang H, Yang M, Hou M, et al. Effect of pre-existing {101-2} extension twins on mechanical properties, microstructure evolution and dynamic recrystallization of AZ31 Mg alloy during uniaxial compression
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2019, 744: 456-470. 


[4]Cheng W, Hao M, Wang L, et al. Microstructure evolution and texture tailoring during hot compression at low temperatures of an extruded dilute Mg-0.5Sn-0.5Zn-0.5Al alloy
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2020, 789: 139606.


[5]Pei Y, Godfrey A, Jiang J, et al. Extension twin variant selection during uniaxial compression of a magnesium alloy
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012, 550: 138-145.


[6]Hou M, Zhang H, Fan J, et al. Microstructure evolution and deformation behaviors of AZ31 Mg alloy with different grain orientation during uniaxial compression
[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018, 741: 514-526. 


[7]Li L, Liu W, Qi F, et al. Effects of deformation twins on microstructure evolution, mechanical properties and corrosion behaviors in magnesium alloys: A review
[J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2022, 10(9): 2334-2353.


[8]Fernández A, Prado M T P, Wei Y, et al. Continuum modeling of the response of a Mg alloy AZ31 rolled sheet during uniaxial deformation
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2011, 27(11): 1739-1757.


[9]Zhang F, Liu Z, Yang M, et al. Microscopic mechanism exploration and constitutive equation construction for compression characteristics of AZ31-TD magnesium alloy at high strain rate
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2020, 771: 138571.


[10]Malik A, Wang Y, Cheng H W, et al. Constitutive analysis, twinning, recrystallization, and crack in fine-grained ZK61 Mg alloy during high strain rate compression over a wide range of temperatures
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2020, 771: 138649.


[11]Xia D, Huang G S, Liu S, et al. Microscopic deformation compatibility during biaxial tension in AZ31 Mg alloy rolled sheet at room temperature
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2019, 756: 1-10.


[12]Cheng Y, Fu Y, Xin Y C, et al. {101-2} twinning behavior under biaxial tension of Mg-3Al-1Zn plate
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020, 132: 102754.


[13]Fu Y, Cheng Y, Cui Y, et al. Deformation mechanisms and differential work hardening behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy during biaxial deformation
[J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2022, 10(2): 478-491.


[14]Cai Z Y, Meng B, Wan M, et al. A modified yield function for modeling of the evolving yielding behavior and micro-mechanism in biaxial deformation of sheet metals
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020, 129: 102707.


[15]Raj A, Verma R K, Singh P K, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of differential hardening of cold rolled steel sheet under non-proportional loading using biaxial tensile test
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2022, 154: 103297.


[16]夏大彪.双轴应力状态下镁合金室温变形行为研究
[D].重庆:重庆大学,2019.

Xia D B. Study on the Deformation Behavior of Magnesium Alloy under Biaxial Stress State at Room Temperature
[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019.


[17]Teaca M, Charpentier I, Martiny M, et al. Identification of sheet metal plastic anisotropy using heterogeneous biaxial tensile tests
[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2010, 52(4): 572-580.


[18]Bruschi S, Altan T, Banabic D, et al. Testing and modelling of material behaviour and formability in sheet metal forming
[J]. CIRP Annals, 2014, 63(2): 727-749.


[19]Sing W M, Rao K P. Prediction of sheet-metal formability using tensile-test results
[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1993, 37(1-4): 37-51.


[20]Holmberg S, Enquist B, Thilderkvist P. Evaluation of sheet metal formability by tensile tests
[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 145(1): 72-83.


[21]Tasan C C, Hoefnagels J P M, Dekkers E C A, et al. Multi-axial deformation setup for microscopic testing of sheet metal to fracture
[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2012, 52: 669-678.


[22]Jin Z Z, Zha M, Wang S Q, et al. Alloying design and microstructural control strategies towards developing Mg alloys with enhanced ductility
[J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2022, 10(5): 1191-1206.


[23]Kossa A. A new biaxial compression fixture for polymeric foams
[J]. Polymer Testing, 2015, 45: 47-51.


[24]蔡登安,周光明. 用于材料双轴压缩试验的加载装置
[P]. 中国:CN201420589703.8, 2015-03-11.

Cai D A, Zhou G M. Loading device for biaxial compression test of materials
[P]. China:CN201420589703.8, 2015-03-11.


[25]贾东,高洋,晏顺坪. 材料双轴压缩加载装置
[P]. 中国:CN201810769328.8, 2018-11-27.

Jia D, Gao Y, Yan S P. Material biaxial compression loading device
[P]. China:CN201810769328.8, 2018-11-27.


[26]石宝东,申戈,杨冲. 一种用于双轴加载系统的十字压缩试样夹具及其加载方法
[P]. 中国:CN202110703324.1,2021-10-01.

Shi B D, Shen G, Yang C. The invention relates to a cross compression sample fixture for a two-axis loading system and a loading method thereof
[P]. China:CN202110703324.1,2021-10-01.


[27]黄光胜,夏大彪,谢誉璐. 一种比例可调双向同步压缩实验原位观察装置
[P]. 中国:CN201810048882.7,2020-09-15. 

Huang G S, Xia D B, Xie Y L. The invention relates to an in situ observation device for bidirectional synchronous compression experiment with adjustable proportion
[P]. China:CN201810048882.7,2020-09-15.


[28]朱涛.不同加载路径下镁合金的孪生行为及其对塑性变形的影响
[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2019.

Zhu T. Twinning Behavior and Its Effect on Plastic Deformation of Magnsium Alloys under Different Loading Paths
[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019.


[29]Shimizu I, Tada N. Plastic behavior of polycrystalline aluminum during biaxial compression with strain path change
[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2007, 340: 883-888.


[30]Shimizu I, Tada N, Nakayama K. The influence of strain path on biaxial compressive behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy
[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2008, 22(31-32): 5844-5849.


[31]Shimizu I, Tada N. Plastic behaviour and forming limit during biaxial compressions of magnesium alloy AZ31 at room temperature
[A]. EPJ Web of Conferences
[C]. EDP Sciences, 2010.


[32]Kulawinski D, Nagel K, Henkel S, et al. Characterization of stress-strain behavior of a cast TRIP steel under different biaxial planar load ratios
[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2011, 78(8): 1684-1695.


[33]Yang X, Zhao H, Shen G, et al. Effect of compressive load on texture evolution and anisotropic behavior of dual-phase steel under biaxial loading in complete σ11-σ22 space
[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 27: 5140-5153.


[34]Brünig M, Gerke S, Zistl M. Experiments and numerical simulations with the H-specimen on damage and fracture of ductile metals under non-proportional loading paths
[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 217: 106531.


[35]Upadhyay M V, Patra A, Wen W, et al. Mechanical response of stainless steel subjected to biaxial load path changes: Cruciform experiments and multi-scale modeling
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2018, 108: 144-168.


[36]Shi B, Peng Y, Yang C, et al. Loading path dependent distortional hardening of Mg alloys: Experimental investigation and constitutive modeling
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2017, 90: 76-95.


[37]Yang C, Shi B, Peng Y, et al. Loading path dependent distortional hardening of Mg alloys: Experimental investigation and constitutive modeling on cruciform specimens
[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 160: 282-297.


[38]刘庆. 镁合金塑性变形机理研究进展
[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(11): 1458-1472.

Liu Q. Research progress on plastic deformation mechanism of Mg alloys
[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2010, 46(11): 1458-1472.


[39]Xin Y, Jiang J, Chapuis A, et al. Plastic deformation behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy under multiple passes cross compression
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012, 532: 50-57.


[40]Xin Y C, Wang M, Zeng Z, et al. Strengthening and toughening of magnesium alloy by {101-2} extension twins
[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2012, 66(1): 25-28.


[41]Xin Y C, Jiang J, Chapuis A, et al. Plastic deformation behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy under multiple passes cross compression
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012, 532: 50-57.


[42]Xu S, Liu T, Chen H, et al. Reducing the tension-compression yield asymmetry in a hot-rolled Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy via multidirectional pre-compression
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013, 565: 96-101.


[43]Xin Y, Zhou X, Liu Q. Suppressing the tension-compression yield asymmetry of Mg alloy by hybrid extension twins structure
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013, 567: 9-13.


[44]Molnar P, Ostapovets A, Jger A. Reversible motion of twin boundaries in AZ31 alloy and new design of magnesium alloys as smart materials
[J]. Materials & Design, 2014, 56: 509-516.


[45]Wang Z, Liu B, Wang F, et al. Quasi-in-situ study of the twinning evolution of ZC61 alloy during dynamic ED-ERD compression process
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2022, 833: 142576.


[46]Shi Z Z, Zhang Y, Wagner F, et al. Sequential double extension twinning in a magnesium alloy: Combined statistical and micromechanical analyses
[J]. Acta Materialia, 2015, 96: 333-343.


[47]Shi Z Z, Xu J Y, Yu J, et al. Intragranular cross-level twin pairs in AZ31 Mg alloy after sequential biaxial compressions
[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018, 749: 52-59.


[48]Shi Z Z, Liu X. Double extension twin and its related compound twin structures in Mg
[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2018, 54(12): 1715-1724.


[49]Qiao H, Guo X Q, Hong S G, et al. Modeling of {101-2}-{101-2} secondary twinning in pre-compressed Mg alloy AZ31
[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 725: 96-107.


[50]Park S H, Hong S G, Lee C S. In-plane anisotropic deformation behavior of rolled Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy by initial {101-2} twins
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013, 570: 149-163.


[51]Sarker D, Chen D L. Dependence of compressive deformation on pre-strain and loading direction in an extruded magnesium alloy: Texture, twinning and de-twinning
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2014, 596: 134-144.


[52]Xu S, Liu T, Ding X, et al. Reducing the anisotropy of a pre-twinned hot-rolled Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy by plane-strain compression
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2014, 592: 230-235.


[53]Li Y, Cui Y, Bian H, et al. Detwining in Mg alloy with a high density of twin boundaries
[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2014, 15(3): 035003.


[54]Sarker D, Friedman J, Chen D L. Influence of pre-strain on de-twinning activity in an extruded AM30 magnesium alloy
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2014, 605: 73-79.


[55]Song B, Xin R, Liang Y, et al. Twinning characteristic and variant selection in compression of a pre-side-rolled Mg alloy sheet
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2014, 614: 106-115.


[56]郑晓剑,余辉辉,信运昌.利用孪晶界面强韧化镁合金
[J].中国材料进展, 2016,35(11):819-824,834.

Zheng X J, Yu H H, Xin Y C. Hardening and toughening Mg alloys using twin boundaries
[J]. Materials China, 2016, 35(11): 819-824,834.


[57]Shi Z Z. Compound cross-grain boundary extension twin structure and its related twin variant selection in a deformed Mg alloy
[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 716: 128-136.


[58]Xia D, Zhang J, Chen X, et al. Effect of biaxial compressive stress state on the microstructure evolution and deformation compatibility of rolled sheet Mg alloy AZ31 at room temperature
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2020, 789: 139599.


[59]Yang B, Shi C, Zhang S, et al. Quasi-in-situ study on {101-2} twinning-detwinning behavior of rolled Mg-Li alloy in two-step compression (RD)-compression (ND) process
[J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2022, 10(10): 2775-2787.


[60]Xin Y, Wang M, Zeng Z, et al. Tailoring the texture of magnesium alloy by twinning deformation to improve the rolling capability
[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2011, 64(10): 986-989.


[61]Xin Y, Zhou X, Liu Q. Suppressing the tension-compression yield asymmetry of Mg alloy by hybrid extension twins structure
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013, 567: 9-13.


[62]Wang Q, Chen S, Jiang B, et al. Grain size dependence of annealing strengthening of an extruded Mg-Gd-Zn alloy subjected to pre-compression deformation
[J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2022, 10(12): 3576-3588.


[63]Upadhyay M V, Capek J, Panzner T, et al. Microstructure evolution of stainless steel subjected to biaxial load path changes: In-situ neutron diffraction and multi-scale modeling
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2019, 122: 49-72.


[64]Van Petegem S, Wagner J, Panzner T, et al. In-situ neutron diffraction during biaxial deformation
[J]. Acta Materialia, 2016, 105: 404-416.


[65]付志昌.含不同形态析出相变形镁合金的晶体塑性研究
[D]. 秦皇岛:燕山大学,2023.

Fu Z C. Crystal Plasticity Study of Deformed Magnesium Alloys Containing Different Morphological Precipitation Phases
[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2023.


[66]Gonzalez D, Kelleher J F, da Fonseca J Q, et al. Macro and intergranular stress responses of austenitic stainless steel to 90 strain path changes
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012, 546: 263-271.


[67]Upadhyay M V, Capek J, Van Petegem S, et al. Intergranular strain evolution during biaxial loading: A multiscale FE-FFT approach
[J]. JOM, 2017, 69: 839-847.


[68]张昆.TRIP780高强钢的断裂行为研究及半耦合韧性断裂准则的应用
[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2021.

Zhang K. Study on Fracture Behavior of TRIP780 and Application of Semi-coupled Ductile Fracture Criterion
[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2021.


[69]Khan A S, Kazmi R, Farrokh B. Multiaxial and non-proportional loading responses, anisotropy and modeling of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy over wide ranges of strain rates and temperatures
[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2007, 23(6): 931-950.


[70]Cardoso R P R, Adetoro O B. A generalisation of the Hill′s quadratic yield function for planar plastic anisotropy to consider loading direction
[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2017, 128: 253-268.


[71]Tang B, Wang Z, Guo N, et al. An extended Drucker yield criterion to consider tension-compression asymmetry and anisotropy on metallic materials: Modeling and verification
[J]. Metals, 2019, 10(1): 20.


[72]Qiao H, Xin Y C, Zong Z L, et al. Effect of twinning on the yield surface shape of Mg alloy plates under in-plane biaxial loading
[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2021, 216: 211-221.


[73]Wang J, Tang Y, Ye J, et al. Tests and finite element simulation of yield anisotropy and tension-compression strength difference of an extruded ZK60 Mg alloy
[J]. Metals, 2021, 11(4): 576. 


[74]Lee J, Ha J, Bong H J, et al. Evolutionary anisotropy and flow stress in advanced high strength steels under loading path changes
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016, 672: 65-77.


[75]Schwab R, Ruff V. On the nature of the yield point phenomenon
[J]. Acta Materialia, 2013, 61(5): 1798-1808.


[76]Van Liempt P, Sietsma J. A physically based yield criterion I. Determination of the yield stress based on analysis of pre-yield dislocation behaviour
[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016, 662: 80-87.


[77]Chamakura J N, Riemslag A C, Reinton T E, et al. The quantitative relationship between non-linear stress-strain behaviour and dislocation structure in martensitic stainless steel
[J]. Acta Materialia, 2022, 240: 118364.
Service:
This site has not yet opened Download Service】【Add Favorite
Copyright Forging & Stamping Technology.All rights reserved
 Sponsored by: Beijing Research Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Technology; Society for Technology of Plasticity, CMES
Tel: +86-010-62920652 +86-010-82415085     Fax:+86-010-62920652
Address: No.18 Xueqing Road, Beijing 100083, P. R. China
 E-mail: fst@263.net    dyjsgg@163.com