Home
Editorial Committee
Brief Instruction
Back Issues
Instruction to Authors
Submission on line
Contact Us
Chinese

  The journal resolutely  resists all academic misconduct, once found, the paper will be withdrawn immediately.

Title:Analysis on fracture failure model of hot-formed steel based on three-point bending for vehicle door anti-collision beam
Authors:  
Unit:  
KeyWords:  
ClassificationCode:TG142.1
year,vol(issue):pagenumber:2025,50(1):239-248
Abstract:

 The fracture failure characterization model of HS1300 hot-formed steel was studied. Based on the GISSMO fracture failure criterion, five different failure test specimens were designed to obtain the ultimate plastic strain. The Voce++ and Hockett-Sherby combined hardening model was used to fit the mechanical curve of material. The fracture test simulation model was built, and the minimum error of force-displacement curve was taken as the goal to obtain the optimal weight coefficient in the hardening model. The stress triaxiality in the fracture zone of each specimen was extracted in the optimal simulation model. Based on the GISSMO failure criterion, the key parameters were obtained, and the failure model curve was obtained by fitting. The constraint condition of the vehicle door anti-collision beam was simulated, and the three-point bending loading test was carried out. The simulation analysis model was built based on HyperMesh. The bearing force-displacement curves of the test and simulation process were extracted, and the failure modes were compared to verify the reliability of the simulation material model. The results show that the material has high strength and obvious strain rate enhancement effect. When the optimal adjustment coefficient of the combined hardening model is 0.684, the error of the key parameters is the smallest, not exceeding 4%. The maximum error of the key parameters between the three-point bending test and simulation analysis is 5.12%. The error of the maximum load and the displacement corresponding the maximum load are not more than 2%. The form and position of parts failure are also basically the same. It can be seen that the material fracture failure model has high characterization accuracy.

 
Funds:
河北省社会科学基金资助项目(20230202055)
AuthorIntro:
作者简介:张宝青(1979-),男,工学学士,讲师 E-mail:zjwaxzs@163.com
Reference:

 [1]  王鹏程,赵棪,路洪洲,等.超高强度热成形钢研究进展及展望[J].中国冶金,2023,33(11):12-28.


Wang P C, Zhao Y, Lu H Z, et al. Research progress and prospect of ultra-high strength hot-formed steel [J]. China Metallurgy, 2023, 33(11):12-28.

 

[2]  姜子涵,梁宾,姜亚洲,等.汽车安全碰撞仿真的材料断裂卡片对比研究[J].汽车工艺与材料, 2023(8):7-14.

Jiang Z H, Liang B, Jiang Y Z, et al. Comparative research on material fracture cards for automobile safety collision simulation [J]. Automobile Technology & Material, 2023(8): 7-14.

 

[3]  朱建琳,王超超,王秋月.基于Gissmo失效准则的DP590双相钢和热成形钢的断裂特性研究[J].塑性工程学报,2024,31(2):163-172.

Zhu J L, Wang C C, Wang Q Y. Research on fracture characteristics of DP590 double-phase steel and hot-formed steel based on Gissmo failure criterion [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2024, 31(2): 163-172.

 

[4]  孔玉强,张晓莹,段朋,等.基于GISSMO断裂失效模型的高强钢落锤压溃仿真分析[J].锻压技术,2024,49(3):230-239.

Kong Y Q, Zhang X Y, Duan P, et al. Simulation analysis on drop hammer crush of high-strength steel based on GISSMO fracture failure model [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2024, 49(3): 230-239.

 

[5]  董伊康,薛仁杰,张青,等.高强双相钢动态力学及断裂失效行为表征[J].河北冶金,2023(11):47-51,56.

Dong Y K, Xue R J, Zhang Q, et al. Characterization of dynamic mechanics and fracture-failure behavior of high-strength duplex steels [J]. Hebei Metallurgy, 2023(11): 47-51,56.

 

[6]  张伟,刘华赛,桑贺,等.残余奥氏体对双相钢断裂失效性能的影响[J].塑性工程学报,2023,30(11):185-193.

Zhang W, Liu H S, Sang H, et al. Effects of retained austenite on fracture failure properties of dual-phase steel [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering,2023,30(11):185-193.

 

[7]  郭鹤,张玉华.基于MMC准则的双相高强钢HC820/1180DPD+Z断裂失效模型分析[J].锻压技术,2023,48(10):235-244.

Guo H, Zhang Y H. Analysis on fracture failure model for dual-phase high-strength steel HC820/1180DPD+Z based on MMC criterion [J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2023, 48(10): 235-244.

 

[8]  Neukamm F, Feucht M, Haufe A, et al. On closing the constitutive gap between forming and crash simulation [A]. 10th International LS-DYNA Users Conference[C]. Dearborn, 2008.

 

[9]  许伟, 方刚, 张钧萍, 等. 面向汽车碰撞安全的热成形钢断裂失效表征与验证[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2020, 27(6): 121-128. 

Xu W, Fang G, Zhang J P, et al. Fracture failure characterization and verification of hot forming steel for vehicle crash safety [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2020, 27(6): 121-128. 

 

[10]张骥超, 连昌伟, 韩非. 第三代超高强钢QP1180硬化与失效行为研究 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(8): 117-125. 

Zhang J C, Lian C W, Han F. Study on hardening and failure behavior of the 3rd generation ultra-high strength steel QP1180 [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58(8): 117-125.

 

[11]周佳, 梁宾, 赵岩, 等. 复杂应力状态下车用高强钢断裂失效行为表征与应用研究 [J]. 塑性工程学报, 2021, 28(3): 153-163.

Zhou J, Liang B, Zhao Y, et al. Research on characterization and application of fracture failure behavior of automotive high-strength steel under complex stress state [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2021, 28(3): 153-163.

 

[12]吴文明, 千志科, 田晓光, 等. 采用动态冲击汽车零件材料承载特性分析 [J]. 机械设计与制造, 2023(5): 117-120, 125.

Wu W M, Qian Z K, Tian X G, et al. Analysis of load bearing characteristics of parts material based on drop hammer impact [J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2023(5): 117-120, 125.

 

[13]冯毅,黄光杰,路洪洲,等.微合金化超高强热成形车门防撞梁性能验证[J].汽车工艺与材料,2023(8):29-37.

Feng Y, Huang G J, Lu H Z, et al. Performance verification of microalloyed ultra high strength for hot stamped door crash beam [J]. Automobile Technology & Material, 2023(8): 29-37.
Service:
This site has not yet opened Download Service】【Add Favorite
Copyright Forging & Stamping Technology.All rights reserved
 Sponsored by: Beijing Research Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Technology; Society for Technology of Plasticity, CMES
Tel: +86-010-62920652 +86-010-82415085     Fax:+86-010-62920652
Address: No.18 Xueqing Road, Beijing 100083, P. R. China
 E-mail: fst@263.net    dyjsgg@163.com